When i develop a destructor, do i require to explicitly call, C/C++ Programming

When I develop a destructor, do I require to explicitly call the destructors for my member objects?

 

 

Posted Date: 3/15/2013 5:55:11 AM | Location : United States





Let''s work an instance. Imagine you need your constructor Foo::Foo(char) to call another constructor of the similar class, namely Foo::Foo(char,int), in order that Foo::Foo(char,int) would help initialize this object. Unluckily there''s no way to do this in C++.

Some of people do it anyway. Unluckily it doesn''t do what they want. For instance, the line Foo(x, 0); does not call Foo::Foo(char,int) on the this object. Rather then it calls Foo::Foo(char,int) to initialize temporary, local object (not this), then it instantly destructs that temporary while control flows over the ;.

class Foo { public: Foo(char x);

Foo(char x, int y);

...

};

 

Foo::Foo(char x)

{

...

Foo(x, 0); // this line does NOT help initialize the this object!!

...

}

You can combine sometimes two constructors through a default parameter:

class Foo {

public:

Foo(char x, int y=0); // this line combines the two constructors

...

};

If that doesn''t work, for example if there isn''t an suitable default parameter which combines the two constructors, every so often you can share their common code in a private init() member function:

class Foo { public: Foo(char x);

Foo(char x, int y);

... private:

void init(char x, int y);

};

 

Foo::Foo(char x)

{

init(x, int(x) + 7);

...

}

Foo::Foo(char x, int y)

{

init(x, y);

...

}

void Foo::init(char x, int y)

{

...

}

BTW do NOT attempt to get this via placement new. Some of the people think they can say new(this) Foo(x, int(x)+7) in the body of Foo::Foo(char). Constructors do a bunch of little magical things behind the scenes, but that bad technique steps on those partly constructed bits.

 

Posted by | Posted Date: 3/15/2013 5:55:55 AM


Related Discussions:- When i develop a destructor, do i require to explicitly call, Assignment Help, Ask Question on When i develop a destructor, do i require to explicitly call, Get Answer, Expert's Help, When i develop a destructor, do i require to explicitly call Discussions

Write discussion on When i develop a destructor, do i require to explicitly call
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
write a program to find the area under the curve y=f(x) between x=a and x=b integrate y=f(x) between the limits of a and b #include float start_point,

C Program for MULTIPLICATION TABLE   main() {           int a, b=1, c, d;           char ch;           clrscr();           while(ch!='n')           {

Many modern cryptography algorithms require two numbers that are coprime, or sometimes referred to as relatively prime. Two numbers are coprime if their greatest common divisor is

WAP TO SWAP THE THREE DIGIT NUMBER void main () { int b,r,n,r1,r2; clrscr (); printf ("Enter the Value: "); scanf ("%d",&n); r=n%10; n=n/10; r1=n%10;

Program is to define a class as student: Program is to define a class as student and display the records specific depending upon the number class student  {  private:


write a program to find the area under curve y=f(x) between x=a and x=b,integrate y=f(x) between the limits a and b

derivations 1. Regardless of the type of derivation, private members are inherited by the derived class, but cannot be accessed by the new member function of the derived class,

a padovan string p(n) for a natural number n is defined as p(0)=''x'' p(1)=''y'' p(2)=''z'' p(n)=p(n-2)+p(n-3),n>2

Please use C or C++ to write your programs. Our homework will focus on SUN sparc machines because to exploit x86 stack-overflow is too easy. This is not just a programming assignme