When i develop a destructor, do i require to explicitly call, C/C++ Programming

When I develop a destructor, do I require to explicitly call the destructors for my member objects?

 

 

Posted Date: 3/15/2013 5:55:11 AM | Location : United States





Let''s work an instance. Imagine you need your constructor Foo::Foo(char) to call another constructor of the similar class, namely Foo::Foo(char,int), in order that Foo::Foo(char,int) would help initialize this object. Unluckily there''s no way to do this in C++.

Some of people do it anyway. Unluckily it doesn''t do what they want. For instance, the line Foo(x, 0); does not call Foo::Foo(char,int) on the this object. Rather then it calls Foo::Foo(char,int) to initialize temporary, local object (not this), then it instantly destructs that temporary while control flows over the ;.

class Foo { public: Foo(char x);

Foo(char x, int y);

...

};

 

Foo::Foo(char x)

{

...

Foo(x, 0); // this line does NOT help initialize the this object!!

...

}

You can combine sometimes two constructors through a default parameter:

class Foo {

public:

Foo(char x, int y=0); // this line combines the two constructors

...

};

If that doesn''t work, for example if there isn''t an suitable default parameter which combines the two constructors, every so often you can share their common code in a private init() member function:

class Foo { public: Foo(char x);

Foo(char x, int y);

... private:

void init(char x, int y);

};

 

Foo::Foo(char x)

{

init(x, int(x) + 7);

...

}

Foo::Foo(char x, int y)

{

init(x, y);

...

}

void Foo::init(char x, int y)

{

...

}

BTW do NOT attempt to get this via placement new. Some of the people think they can say new(this) Foo(x, int(x)+7) in the body of Foo::Foo(char). Constructors do a bunch of little magical things behind the scenes, but that bad technique steps on those partly constructed bits.

 

Posted by | Posted Date: 3/15/2013 5:55:55 AM


Related Discussions:- When i develop a destructor, do i require to explicitly call, Assignment Help, Ask Question on When i develop a destructor, do i require to explicitly call, Get Answer, Expert's Help, When i develop a destructor, do i require to explicitly call Discussions

Write discussion on When i develop a destructor, do i require to explicitly call
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
A:  it is containing and hiding Information regarding an object, like internal data structures and code. It isolates the internal complication of an object's operation from the res

Set of Integers) Create class IntegerSet. Each IntegerSet object can hold integers in the range 0-100. The set is represented by an array of bools. Array element a[i] is true if in

Program is to define a class as student: Program is to define a class as student and display the records specific depending upon the number class student  {  private:

the program that solve the efficiency of otto cycle

Explain the class invariant. - It's a condition that ensures correct working of a class and defines all the valid states for an object. - When an object is created class inv

Prepare a MT4 EA to clone MT4 Trades to a Binary Options Platform Project Description: I want an EA that clones MT4 Trades to Globaltrader365, GT Options and if possible othe

Convert a COV/CPE (Micosoft Fax Cover Page) file to a TIF image file Project Description: I would like a small API written that will take a COV/CPE file and replaced the corr

#include stdio.h> #include conio.h> #include string.h>   void del(char[],char *); main() {           char str[30],ch,*pp;           clrscr();           p

Employ operator () instead of operator[]. While you have multiple subscripts, the cleanest way to do it is along with operator () instead of with operator[]. The reason is that

Project Description: I want an app that the user can download it from the play store and use it as a keyboard for texts and writing. Just like the Samsung keyboard and the arabi