Two-tape turing machine, Theory of Computation

Let there L1 and L2 . We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG .

Let M1 be a decider for L1 and M2 be a decider for L2 .

Consider a 2-tape TM M:

"On input x:

1. copy x on the second tape

2. on the ?rst tape run M1 on x

M=

3. if M1 accepted then goto 4. else M rejects

4. on the second tape run M2 on x

5. if M2 accepted then M accepts else M rejects."

The machine M is a decider and it accepts a string x i? both M1 and M2 accept x.

Two-tape TM is as expressive as the single tape TM.

The process is as follows

"Given a CFG G and a string w , does G generate w ?

Language Formulation (Acceptance Problem for CFG) def

ACFG = {?G , w ? | G is a CFG, w a string and w ∈ L(G )}

The language ACFG is decidable.

 Construct a decider M for ACFG :M = " 1. On input x check if x = ?G , w ? where

G is an CFG and w is a string, if not then M rejects.

2. Convert G into Chomsky normal form.

3. List all derivations in G of length exactly 2|w | - 1,

if w = ? then check if there is the rule S → ?.

4. If w is ever generated then M accepts, else M rejects."

Posted Date: 2/23/2013 12:51:23 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Two-tape turing machine, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Two-tape turing machine, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Two-tape turing machine Discussions

Write discussion on Two-tape turing machine
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
We'll close our consideration of regular languages by looking at whether (certain) problems about regular languages are algorithmically decidable.

The Universality Problem is the dual of the emptiness problem: is L(A) = Σ∗? It can be solved by minor variations of any one of the algorithms for Emptiness or (with a little le

The fact that regular languages are closed under Boolean operations simpli?es the process of establishing regularity of languages; in essence we can augment the regular operations

The initial ID of the automaton given in Figure 3, running on input ‘aabbba' is (A, aabbba) The ID after the ?rst three transitions of the computation is (F, bba) The p

The fact that SL 2 is closed under intersection but not under union implies that it is not closed under complement since, by DeMorgan's Theorem L 1 ∩ L 2 = We know that


And what this money. Invovle who it involves and the fact of,how we got itself identified candidate and not withstanding time date location. That shouts me media And answers who''v

draw pda for l={an,bm,an/m,n>=0} n is in superscript

What are the benefits of using work breakdown structure, Project Management

Can you say that B is decidable? If you somehow know that A is decidable, what can you say about B?