Transition graph for the automaton, Theory of Computation

Lemma 1 A string w ∈ Σ* is accepted by an LTk automaton iff w is the concatenation of the symbols labeling the edges of a path through the LTk transition graph of A from h?, ∅i to an accepting node.

This is quick to verify. The path corresponding to any string w leads to a node labeled with hv, Si iff S = Fk(?  w) and that will be a node that is circled iff augmented strings with that set of k-factors (plus v?) satisfy φA. There are a few important things to note about LTk transition graphs. First of all, every LTk automata over a given alphabet shares exactly the same node set and edge set. The only distinction between them is which nodes are accepting nodes and which are not. Secondly, they are invariably inconveniently large. Every LT2 automaton over a two symbol alphabet- pretty much the minimum interesting automaton-will have a transition graph the size of the graph of Figure 1. Fortunately, other than the graph of the example we will not have any need to draw these out. We can reason about the paths through them without ever actually looking at the entire graph.

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 3:24:09 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Transition graph for the automaton, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Transition graph for the automaton, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Transition graph for the automaton Discussions

Write discussion on Transition graph for the automaton
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Distinguish between Mealy and Moore Machine? Construct a Mealy machine that can output EVEN or ODD According to the total no. of 1's encountered is even or odd.


Theorem (Myhill-Nerode) A language L ⊆ Σ is recognizable iff ≡L partitions Σ* into ?nitely many Nerode equivalence classes. Proof: For the "only if" direction (that every recogn


c program to convert dfa to re

These assumptions hold for addition, for instance. Every instance of addition has a unique solution. Each instance is a pair of numbers and the possible solutions include any third

This was one of the ?rst substantial theorems of Formal Language Theory. It's maybe not too surprising to us, as we have already seen a similar equivalence between LTO and SF. But

Let there L1 and L2 . We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG . Let M1 be a decider for L1 and M2 be a decider for L2 . Consider a 2-tape TM M: "On input x: 1. copy x on the second

matlab v matlab

The Last Stop Boutique is having a five-day sale. Each day, starting on Monday, the price will drop 10% of the previous day’s price. For example, if the original price of a product