Transition graph for the automaton, Theory of Computation

Lemma 1 A string w ∈ Σ* is accepted by an LTk automaton iff w is the concatenation of the symbols labeling the edges of a path through the LTk transition graph of A from h?, ∅i to an accepting node.

This is quick to verify. The path corresponding to any string w leads to a node labeled with hv, Si iff S = Fk(?  w) and that will be a node that is circled iff augmented strings with that set of k-factors (plus v?) satisfy φA. There are a few important things to note about LTk transition graphs. First of all, every LTk automata over a given alphabet shares exactly the same node set and edge set. The only distinction between them is which nodes are accepting nodes and which are not. Secondly, they are invariably inconveniently large. Every LT2 automaton over a two symbol alphabet- pretty much the minimum interesting automaton-will have a transition graph the size of the graph of Figure 1. Fortunately, other than the graph of the example we will not have any need to draw these out. We can reason about the paths through them without ever actually looking at the entire graph.

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 3:24:09 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Transition graph for the automaton, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Transition graph for the automaton, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Transition graph for the automaton Discussions

Write discussion on Transition graph for the automaton
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Ask question #Minimum 100 words accepte


Find the Regular Grammar for the following Regular Expression: a(a+b)*(ab*+ba*)b.

Theorem (Myhill-Nerode) A language L ⊆ Σ is recognizable iff ≡L partitions Σ* into ?nitely many Nerode equivalence classes. Proof: For the "only if" direction (that every recogn

Find the Regular Grammar for the following Regular Expression:                    a(a+b)*(ab*+ba*)b.

Both L 1 and L 2 are SL 2 . (You should verify this by thinking about what the automata look like.) We claim that L 1 ∪ L 2 ∈ SL 2 . To see this, suppose, by way of con

distinguish between histogram and historigram

Computer has a single unbounded precision counter which you can only increment, decrement and test for zero. (You may assume that it is initially zero or you may include an explici

It is not hard to see that ε-transitions do not add to the accepting power of the model. The underlying idea is that whenever an ID (q, σ  v) directly computes another (p, v) via

The path function δ : Q × Σ* → P(Q) is the extension of δ to strings: This just says that the path labeled ε from any given state q goes only to q itself (or rather never l