Third model of computation, Theory of Computation

Computer has a single LIFO stack containing ?xed precision unsigned integers (so each integer is subject to over?ow problems) but which has unbounded depth (so the stack itself never over?ows).

In your program you should limit yourself to accessing this with methods like push(i), top(), pop(), and a predicate like empty?(). These will push a value into the stack, return the value stored in the top of the stack (the most recent value pushed), discard the top of stack,
and test the stack for empty, respectively. Don't forget that you have no storage outside of the stack, so you need to work directly with the values in the stack-you can't pull a value out of the stack and assign it to some other variable. Similarly, while you can call input() as
often as you wish, the only way to store the value of the input is to push it directly into the stack (e.g., push(input())).

(a) Sketch an algorithm to recognize the language of strings of the form wcwr where w is any sequence of ‘a's and ‘b's and wr is exactly the same sequence of ‘a's and ‘b's in reverse order, so these are all palindromes over the alphabet {a, b, c} in which 'c' occurs only as the middle symbol. It includes strings like:

abbbcabbb aca ababacababa c

(In the last example there are no ‘a's or ‘b's, the "re?ected" string is empty.)

(b) What is your intuition about recognizing this language within the second model (i.e., using just a single counter)?

(c) What is your intuition about the possibility of recognizing the language of strings of the form wcw, where w is an arbitrary string of ‘a's and ‘b's? This is the set of strings made up of any sequence of ‘a's and ‘b's followed by a 'c' and then exactly the same sequence of ‘a's and ‘b's in exactly the same order; it's referred to as the (deterministic) copy language.

Posted Date: 3/20/2013 6:16:01 AM | Location : United States

Related Discussions:- Third model of computation, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Third model of computation, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Third model of computation Discussions

Write discussion on Third model of computation
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
The k-local Myhill graphs provide an easy means to generalize the suffix substitution closure property for the strictly k-local languages. Lemma (k-Local Suffix Substitution Clo

When we say "solved algorithmically" we are not asking about a speci?c programming language, in fact one of the theorems in computability is that essentially all reasonable program

Explain Theory of Computation ,Overview of DFA,NFA, CFG, PDA, Turing Machine, Regular Language, Context Free Language, Pumping Lemma, Context Sensitive Language, Chomsky Normal For

In Exercise 9 you showed that the recognition problem and universal recognition problem for SL2 are decidable. We can use the structure of Myhill graphs to show that other problems

Let there L1 and L2 . We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG . Let M1 be a decider for L1 and M2 be a decider for L2 . Consider a 2-tape TM M: "On input x: 1. copy x on the second

State and Prove the Arden's theorem for Regular Expression

how to understand DFA ?

I want a proof for any NP complete problem