Theory of indices, Mathematics

In algebra knowing that 23 = 8 is not sufficient. Equally important to know is what would be the result if quantities like 23 . 2-4 . 26 or  37 / 32  are simplified. Mind you, finding the value of quantities like these in most of the problems is not an end in itself. The values of these quantities form an input for solving the problem further. Hence, simplifying these quantities help us to solve more advanced problems. Also that, one feels monotonous if he tries to simplify quantities like these by stating at each step what they literally mean. In this part we learn about the laws of indices and understand the logic behind these concepts.

Law 1

am  x an = am+n, when m and n are positive integers.

By the above definition, am  = a x a ...... to m factors and

                                      an  = a x a .... to n factors.

am x an        = (a x a...to m factors) (a x a...to n factors)

                   =  a x a .................... to m + n  factors

                   =  am+n

Now we extend this logic to negative integers and fractions. First let us consider this for negative integer, that is, m will be replaced by - n. By the definition of
am x an = am+n, we get

                            a-n x an = a-n+n = a0

But we know that a0 = 1

 

Hence, a-n = 1/ an or an = 1/ a-n  .

Similarly, what would be the case if m = p/q and n = p/q. By definition, we have

                            ap/q x ap/q = ap/q +  p/q   = a2p/q

This can be written as  2082_theory of indices.png  This is similar to taking the qth root of a2p. Now what would be the result if we proceed to multiply ap/q, q number of times. That is,

ap/q x ap/q x ap/q  x ap/q ...........  to q factors will be equal to aqp/q

We express this as  (ap/q)q= ap, that is taking the qth root of ap.

Apart from these we look at the meaning of a0. In this case the value of m = 0. Therefore, by definition

                            a0 x an = a0+n   = an

This can be also expressed as   a0 = an /an  = 1.

Now we take a numerical and check the validity of this law.

         26 x  27        =     (2 x 2 ....  to 6 factors)

                                   (2 x 2 ...... to 7 factors)

or,     26+7             =     2 x 2 ....... to (6 + 7) factors

                            =     213           = 8192

or else,

         26 x 27         =     (2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2) x

                                    (2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2)

                            =     (64)(128)

                            =     8192

(Note: The same logic can be extended to more than two factors also.)

Law 2

am/an = am-n, when m and n are positive integers and m > n.

By definition,    am   = a x a ....... to m factors  and

                      an   = a x a ....... to n factors

Therefore, am / an = 2227_law.png

      = a x a ....... to m - n factors
      = am-n

Now we take a numerical and check the validity of this law.

27

/

24    = 1927_law1.png

      = 2 x 2 x 2......to (7 - 4) factors
      = 2 x 2 x 2......to 3 factors
      = 23    = 8

or else,

27 / 24 = 2174_law2.png

          = 2 x 2 x 2 = 21+1+1  = 23
          = 8

Law 3

(am)n = amn, when m and n are positive integers.

By definition, (am)n   = am x am x am .... to n factors.
    (a x a ... to m factors) ....... to n times
  = a x a ..... to mn factors
  = amn

Now let us look whether this is true for positive fractions. We will keep m as it is and replace n by p/q, where p and q are positive integers. Then we will have

                            (am)n = (am)p/q

Now the qth power of (am)p/q  = {(am)p/q}q

 

= 877_law3.png
= (am)p
= amp

If we take the qth root of the above, we obtain

 

(am)p/q = 888_law4.png

For n being any negative quantity: In this case also m remains the same and n be replaced by - r, where r is positive. Then we have

(am)n

= (am)-r = 2414_law5.png

=

444_law6.png = a-mr

Again replacing -r by n, we obtain amn.

Now with the help of a numerical example let us verify this law.

(24)3 = 24 x 24 x 24
  = 24+4+4
  = 212  =  4096
or else,    
(24)3   = (24) (24) (24 )
  = (2 x 2 x 2 x 2) (2 x 2 x 2 x 2)
    (2 x 2 x 2 x 2)
  = (16) (16) (16)
  = 4096
Posted Date: 9/13/2012 4:13:19 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Theory of indices, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Theory of indices, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Theory of indices Discussions

Write discussion on Theory of indices
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Integral Test- Harmonic Series In harmonic series discussion we said that the harmonic series was a divergent series.  It is now time to demonstrate that statement.  This pr

Given: ??????? is supp. to ??????? ???? ????? bisects ??????? ???? ????? bisects ??????? Prove: ??????? is a rt. ?

Find out the volume of the solid obtained by rotating the region bounded by y = (x -1) ( x - 3) 2 and the x-axis about the y-axis. Solution Let's first graph the bounded r

Squeeze Theorem (Sandwich Theorem and the Pinching Theorem) Assume that for all x on [a, b] (except possibly at x = c ) we have,                                 f ( x )≤ h (

Taylor Series - Sequences and Series In the preceding section we started looking at writing down a power series presentation of a function.  The difficulty with the approach

a manufacturer is interested in developing a benefit segmentation of the cameramarket.suggest some major benefit segments with market targeting strategies.

Now come to addition and subtraction of rational expressions.  Following are the general formulas.  (a/c) + (b/c) = (a + b)/c

Do you agree with the necessity of the sequencing E - L - P - S for learning? If not, then what do you suggest as an alternative path for understanding and internalising mathematic

How to Make Equations of Conics Easier to Read ? If you want to graph a conic sections, first you need to make the equation easy to read. For example, say you have the equatio