Theory of indices, Mathematics

In algebra knowing that 23 = 8 is not sufficient. Equally important to know is what would be the result if quantities like 23 . 2-4 . 26 or  37 / 32  are simplified. Mind you, finding the value of quantities like these in most of the problems is not an end in itself. The values of these quantities form an input for solving the problem further. Hence, simplifying these quantities help us to solve more advanced problems. Also that, one feels monotonous if he tries to simplify quantities like these by stating at each step what they literally mean. In this part we learn about the laws of indices and understand the logic behind these concepts.

Law 1

am  x an = am+n, when m and n are positive integers.

By the above definition, am  = a x a ...... to m factors and

                                      an  = a x a .... to n factors.

am x an        = (a x m factors) (a x n factors)

                   =  a x a .................... to m + n  factors

                   =  am+n

Now we extend this logic to negative integers and fractions. First let us consider this for negative integer, that is, m will be replaced by - n. By the definition of
am x an = am+n, we get

                            a-n x an = a-n+n = a0

But we know that a0 = 1


Hence, a-n = 1/ an or an = 1/ a-n  .

Similarly, what would be the case if m = p/q and n = p/q. By definition, we have

                            ap/q x ap/q = ap/q +  p/q   = a2p/q

This can be written as  2082_theory of indices.png  This is similar to taking the qth root of a2p. Now what would be the result if we proceed to multiply ap/q, q number of times. That is,

ap/q x ap/q x ap/q  x ap/q ...........  to q factors will be equal to aqp/q

We express this as  (ap/q)q= ap, that is taking the qth root of ap.

Apart from these we look at the meaning of a0. In this case the value of m = 0. Therefore, by definition

                            a0 x an = a0+n   = an

This can be also expressed as   a0 = an /an  = 1.

Now we take a numerical and check the validity of this law.

         26 x  27        =     (2 x 2 ....  to 6 factors)

                                   (2 x 2 ...... to 7 factors)

or,     26+7             =     2 x 2 ....... to (6 + 7) factors

                            =     213           = 8192

or else,

         26 x 27         =     (2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2) x

                                    (2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2)

                            =     (64)(128)

                            =     8192

(Note: The same logic can be extended to more than two factors also.)

Law 2

am/an = am-n, when m and n are positive integers and m > n.

By definition,    am   = a x a ....... to m factors  and

                      an   = a x a ....... to n factors

Therefore, am / an = 2227_law.png

      = a x a ....... to m - n factors
      = am-n

Now we take a numerical and check the validity of this law.



24    = 1927_law1.png

      = 2 x 2 x (7 - 4) factors
      = 2 x 2 x 3 factors
      = 23    = 8

or else,

27 / 24 = 2174_law2.png

          = 2 x 2 x 2 = 21+1+1  = 23
          = 8

Law 3

(am)n = amn, when m and n are positive integers.

By definition, (am)n   = am x am x am .... to n factors.
    (a x a ... to m factors) ....... to n times
  = a x a ..... to mn factors
  = amn

Now let us look whether this is true for positive fractions. We will keep m as it is and replace n by p/q, where p and q are positive integers. Then we will have

                            (am)n = (am)p/q

Now the qth power of (am)p/q  = {(am)p/q}q


= 877_law3.png
= (am)p
= amp

If we take the qth root of the above, we obtain


(am)p/q = 888_law4.png

For n being any negative quantity: In this case also m remains the same and n be replaced by - r, where r is positive. Then we have


= (am)-r = 2414_law5.png


444_law6.png = a-mr

Again replacing -r by n, we obtain amn.

Now with the help of a numerical example let us verify this law.

(24)3 = 24 x 24 x 24
  = 24+4+4
  = 212  =  4096
or else,    
(24)3   = (24) (24) (24 )
  = (2 x 2 x 2 x 2) (2 x 2 x 2 x 2)
    (2 x 2 x 2 x 2)
  = (16) (16) (16)
  = 4096
Posted Date: 9/13/2012 4:13:19 AM | Location : United States

Related Discussions:- Theory of indices, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Theory of indices, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Theory of indices Discussions

Write discussion on Theory of indices
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
a man in rested rupee 800 is buying rupee 5 shares and then are selling at premium of rupee 1.15. He sells all the shares.find profit

verify 4(sin^4 30^0+cos60^0 )-3(cos^2 ?45?^0-sin^2 90^0 )=2

reflection about index number in a creative way

Determining the Laplace transform of a function is not terribly hard if we've found a table of transforms opposite us to use as we saw in the previous section. What we would want t

Comparison Test or Limit Comparison Test In the preceding section we saw how to relate a series to an improper integral to find out the convergence of a series.  When the inte

Karen is buying a wallpaper border for her bedroom, that is 12 ft by 13 ft If the border is sold in rolls of 5 yards each, how many rolls will she required to purchase? The dis

Lucas purchased his motorcycle for $5,875.98 and sold it for $7,777.77. What was his profit? To ?nd out the pro?t, you must subtract what Lucas paid for the motorcycle from the

what is the difference between North America''s part of the total population and Africa''s part