The f-wald test, Advanced Statistics

Primary Model

Below is a regression analysis without 17 outliers that have been removed

Regression Analysis: wfood versus totexp, income, age, nk

The regression equation is

wfood = 0.378 - 0.00129 totexp - 0.000054 income + 0.00170 age + 0.0317 nk

Predictor              Coef       SE Coef           T          P         VIF

Constant         0.37816     0.01356         27.89  0.000

totexp         -0.00128554  0.00006284  -20.46  0.000    1.324

income        -0.00005410  0.00004950   -1.09   0.275    1.341

age              0.0016993    0.0003058      5.56   0.000    1.065

nk                0.031717      0.004676        6.78   0.000    1.007

S = 0.0880161   R-Sq = 28.0%   R-Sq(adj) = 27.8%

Analysis of Variance

Source               DF       SS          MS         F           P

Regression         4      4.5159    1.1290  145.73  0.000

Residual Error   1497  11.5970   0.0077

  Lack of Fit       1328   10.1731  0.0077    0.91  0.806

  Pure Error        169    1.4239    0.0084

Total                  1501  16.1129

 

Secondary Model

Below is a regression analysis without 17 outliers that have been removed and dropping the income variable   

Regression Analysis: wfood versus totexp, age, nk

The regression equation is

wfood = 0.376 - 0.00132 totexp + 0.00165 age + 0.0317 nk

Predictor         Coef     SE Coef       T      P    VIF

Constant       0.37593     0.01341   28.04  0.000

totexp     -0.00131710  0.00005581  -23.60  0.000  1.045

age          0.0016462   0.0003019    5.45  0.000  1.038

nk            0.031672    0.004676    6.77  0.000  1.007

S = 0.0880218   R-Sq = 28.0%   R-Sq(adj) = 27.8%

Analysis of Variance

Source               DF       SS          MS          F           P

Regression         3       4.5067   1.5022   193.89  0.000

Residual Error   1498  11.6063  0.0077

  Lack of Fit       644    4.9570    0.0077    0.99     0.560

  Pure Error      854     6.6493    0.0078

Total               1501    16.1129

The Null Hypothesis - H0: No difference between the primary and secondary model

1465_The F-Wald Test.png

Since the F value is 1.2005 < 3.8477 there is sufficient evidence to suggest that we accept H0 implying that there is no difference between the primary and secondary model and income can be removed.

Posted Date: 3/4/2013 7:10:51 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- The f-wald test, Assignment Help, Ask Question on The f-wald test, Get Answer, Expert's Help, The f-wald test Discussions

Write discussion on The f-wald test
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
The graphical process most frequently used in the analysis of data from a two-by-two crossover design. For each of the subject the difference between the response variable values o

How large would the sample need to be if we are to pick a 95% confidence level sample: (i) From a population of 70; (ii) From a population of 450; (iii) From a population of 1000;

Randomized encouragement trial   is the clinical trials in which the participants are encouraged to change their behaviour in a particular manner (or not, if they are allocated to

The number of passengers arriving at an airport terminal average 1200 each hour. To process passengers (check in, take luggage, etc) take an average of 6 minutes each. There are

It is the art of attempting to exchange something quite small and certain, for something which are large and uncertain. Gambling is big business; in the US, for instance, it is at

Correlation matrix : A square, symmetric matrix with the rows and columns corresponding to the variables, in which the non diagonal elements are correlations between the pairs of t

The variables appearing on the right-hand side of equations defining, for instance, multiple regressions or the logistic regression, and which seek to predict or 'explain' response

Interior analysis is the  term now and again applied to analysis carried out on the fitted model in regression problem. The basic target of such analyses is the identification of

what is the combine standard deviation height from the follwing