Rule in foss v harbottle, Business Law and Ethics

RULE IN FOSS v HARBOTTLE:

 What has come to be recognized in company law as "the rule in Foss v Harbottle" is the decision of Vice-Chancellor Wigram in the case of Foss v Harbottle in which the facts, briefly, were as follows.

The plaintiffs, Foss and Turton, were shareholders in a company called The Victoria Park Co. which was formed by statute to buy land for use as a pleasure park. The defendants were the company's five directors and others.  The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants had defrauded the company in various ways, and in particular that certain of the defendants had sold land belonging to them to the company at an exorbitant price. They asked the court to order the defendants to make good the losses to the company and also sought the appointment of a receiver.

It was held that it was incompetent for the plaintiffs to bring such going on, the sole right to do so being that of the company in its corporate character.  The judge stated:

"In law the corporation and the aggregate members of the corporation are not the same thing for purposes like this; and the only question can be whether the facts alleged in this case justify a departure from the rule that, prima facie, would utilize that the corporation should sue in its own name and in its corporate character or in the name of someone whom the law has appointed to be its representative."

The judge eventually concluded that no departure from the rule was justified in the case before him.  The same rule was restated with more clarity by Lord Davey in Burland v Earle when he stated;

"In order to redress a wrong done to the company or to recover moneys or damages alleged to be due to the company, the action there should prima facie be brought by the company itself."

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 2:57:59 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Rule in foss v harbottle, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Rule in foss v harbottle, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Rule in foss v harbottle Discussions

Write discussion on Rule in foss v harbottle
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Explain Self determination Self determination is actually the foundation of United Nations (UN) Charter. It is defined as a right of people to determine and to choose their ow

Consideration - Element of Contract Just to an agreement to constitute a contract the common law of the England then adopted in the US, requires such, must be supported with c

Question 1: Constructive dismissal is inherently different from dismissal in the sense that it is the employee who takes the initiative in considering the contract as having be

Registration Procedures: The procedures to be followed by persons who intend to form a registered company will depend on whether the proposed company is to be a public company

There are certain legislations passed regarding state succession. For example, The continuance of legal Proceedings Act 1950; The Pakistan Currency Act 1950; The Pakistan

Why International law is very different from domestic law International law is very different from domestic law because in domestic disputes there are Courts to adjudicate upon

QUESTION (i) (a) What is the composition of the Public Service Commission?     (b) How are the commissioners appointed? (ii) (a) What is the composition of the Judicial a

Jurisdiction - High Court Whether under Section 60 of the constitution states in which the High Court shall have 'unlimited original jurisdiction in civil and the criminal mat

REGULATIONS REGARDING HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES A hazardous substance has the potential to harm. It may cause harm to human beings, other living creatures, plants, microorganisms, p

Illustrate the case of environmental taxes Consider the case of environmental taxes. There is clear evidence that International Environmental Agreements (IEAs) suffers from an