Rule in foss v harbottle, Business Law and Ethics

RULE IN FOSS v HARBOTTLE:

 What has come to be recognized in company law as "the rule in Foss v Harbottle" is the decision of Vice-Chancellor Wigram in the case of Foss v Harbottle in which the facts, briefly, were as follows.

The plaintiffs, Foss and Turton, were shareholders in a company called The Victoria Park Co. which was formed by statute to buy land for use as a pleasure park. The defendants were the company's five directors and others.  The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants had defrauded the company in various ways, and in particular that certain of the defendants had sold land belonging to them to the company at an exorbitant price. They asked the court to order the defendants to make good the losses to the company and also sought the appointment of a receiver.

It was held that it was incompetent for the plaintiffs to bring such going on, the sole right to do so being that of the company in its corporate character.  The judge stated:

"In law the corporation and the aggregate members of the corporation are not the same thing for purposes like this; and the only question can be whether the facts alleged in this case justify a departure from the rule that, prima facie, would utilize that the corporation should sue in its own name and in its corporate character or in the name of someone whom the law has appointed to be its representative."

The judge eventually concluded that no departure from the rule was justified in the case before him.  The same rule was restated with more clarity by Lord Davey in Burland v Earle when he stated;

"In order to redress a wrong done to the company or to recover moneys or damages alleged to be due to the company, the action there should prima facie be brought by the company itself."

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 2:57:59 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Rule in foss v harbottle, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Rule in foss v harbottle, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Rule in foss v harbottle Discussions

Write discussion on Rule in foss v harbottle
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Statutory Form:                    Section 14 of the Act provides that the form of the  Memorandum of Association of a company limited by shares shall be in accordance with th

Question 1: (a) Discuss the powers and duties of the employer under the Employment Rights Act 2008? (b) Discuss the powers and duties of the worker under the Employme

Define the non-state actors Besides the efforts of ILC in defining a link between the state responsibility and non-state actors, some UNSC resolutions have tried to define the

Question 1: Mr Ben is the director of ABC Ltd. He wishes to know whether he has any responsibility under the OSHA regarding the presence of the following in his enterprise:

online Law test, Due tomorrow December 14th, 20 multiple choice questions and 4 essay questions. Topics, Obscenity, child porn; broadcasting indecency, citizens united, ipr & cop

Political and Education function of Chief Justice Political Function Moreover the chief justice administers the presidential oath for the person who is elected like pre

QUESTION 1 What are the role, powers, functions, aims and objectives of Trade Unions in maintaining a sound and harmonious relations? QUESTION 2 (a) What are the possib

Bulky and technical Bills: In fact some Bills are so bulky and technical hence they are passed without sufficient debate it means Parliament lacks the time and knowledge to th

What are the effects of the monetary expansion The first diagram corresponds to the case when both countries maintain a fixed exchange rate, and the second is when they allow

John owns a 1951 Mercedes Sl that he wishes to sell. He instructs Ross to sell the car, and in return, will be paid £5,000 commission. Ross manages to find a buyer, Paul, Paul and