Rule in foss v harbottle, Business Law and Ethics


 What has come to be recognized in company law as "the rule in Foss v Harbottle" is the decision of Vice-Chancellor Wigram in the case of Foss v Harbottle in which the facts, briefly, were as follows.

The plaintiffs, Foss and Turton, were shareholders in a company called The Victoria Park Co. which was formed by statute to buy land for use as a pleasure park. The defendants were the company's five directors and others.  The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants had defrauded the company in various ways, and in particular that certain of the defendants had sold land belonging to them to the company at an exorbitant price. They asked the court to order the defendants to make good the losses to the company and also sought the appointment of a receiver.

It was held that it was incompetent for the plaintiffs to bring such going on, the sole right to do so being that of the company in its corporate character.  The judge stated:

"In law the corporation and the aggregate members of the corporation are not the same thing for purposes like this; and the only question can be whether the facts alleged in this case justify a departure from the rule that, prima facie, would utilize that the corporation should sue in its own name and in its corporate character or in the name of someone whom the law has appointed to be its representative."

The judge eventually concluded that no departure from the rule was justified in the case before him.  The same rule was restated with more clarity by Lord Davey in Burland v Earle when he stated;

"In order to redress a wrong done to the company or to recover moneys or damages alleged to be due to the company, the action there should prima facie be brought by the company itself."

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 2:57:59 AM | Location : United States

Related Discussions:- Rule in foss v harbottle, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Rule in foss v harbottle, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Rule in foss v harbottle Discussions

Write discussion on Rule in foss v harbottle
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Liability by Estoppel Anyone who presents himself or permits himself for be represented, further by words, conduct or writing as the partner about another person like  persons

Stolen Goods - Sales of Goods Where goods have been stolen and had been the thief has been prosecuted and convicted, such the property in the goods revests in like original ow

Mr. Hellerstein is a professor at Tahoe Law School located in Tahoe California. He lives in Nevada and commutes to Tahoe Law School, which is only a 50-mile, commute one way.  Duri

XYZ Ltd has 1000 members and it has adopted a constitution. Matt is one of the directors of XYZ Ltd. Matt has made a gift of $10,000 to his wife, Melissa out of the Company's funds

QUESTION 1 Discuss the functions of the following- (a) The Workfare Programme (b) The Advisory Council for Occupational Safety and Health (c) Health and Safety Officer

Defined specific acts that constitute an act of terrorism:- Convention on Offences on Board Tokyo Aircraft 1963 relates to hijacking. Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft in Hague 1

I would like to know more about Domicile of Dependency at English Law: Married women and minors.

Q. Show the Number of phoenix operators ? A key challenge in quantifying phoenix activity is estimating the number of companies engaging in the activity. In 2001/02, 1.6% of co

Civil Liabilities: LIABILITY FOR FAILURE TO STATE ANY MATTER OR REPORT At Common Law, a contract of allotment is not a contract Uberrimae Fidei. The company is therefore no