Rule in foss v harbottle, Business Law and Ethics

RULE IN FOSS v HARBOTTLE:

 What has come to be recognized in company law as "the rule in Foss v Harbottle" is the decision of Vice-Chancellor Wigram in the case of Foss v Harbottle in which the facts, briefly, were as follows.

The plaintiffs, Foss and Turton, were shareholders in a company called The Victoria Park Co. which was formed by statute to buy land for use as a pleasure park. The defendants were the company's five directors and others.  The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants had defrauded the company in various ways, and in particular that certain of the defendants had sold land belonging to them to the company at an exorbitant price. They asked the court to order the defendants to make good the losses to the company and also sought the appointment of a receiver.

It was held that it was incompetent for the plaintiffs to bring such going on, the sole right to do so being that of the company in its corporate character.  The judge stated:

"In law the corporation and the aggregate members of the corporation are not the same thing for purposes like this; and the only question can be whether the facts alleged in this case justify a departure from the rule that, prima facie, would utilize that the corporation should sue in its own name and in its corporate character or in the name of someone whom the law has appointed to be its representative."

The judge eventually concluded that no departure from the rule was justified in the case before him.  The same rule was restated with more clarity by Lord Davey in Burland v Earle when he stated;

"In order to redress a wrong done to the company or to recover moneys or damages alleged to be due to the company, the action there should prima facie be brought by the company itself."

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 2:57:59 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Rule in foss v harbottle, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Rule in foss v harbottle, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Rule in foss v harbottle Discussions

Write discussion on Rule in foss v harbottle
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
What is the territorial sovereignty The territorial sovereignty includes the land territory, the territorial sea, the seabed and the subsoil of the territorial sea. It also inc

Length of Notice - Meetings and resolutions: S.133(1) provides that any provision of a company's articles shall be void in so far as it provides for the called of a meeting of

Select a manufacturing organization and find out the ethical issues of the organization in the following areas: Production: Marketing & sales: Human Resources & employee relatio

What is hire purchase?

Suppose your employer wanted to include a restraint of trade clause in your employment agreement. Prepare and set out an instance of this clause that would be applicable to you in

Powers and Duties:  The powers and duties of the secretary depend on the size and nature of the company and the personal contractual arrangements that it makes with him. Howev

Question 1: What do you consider to have been the significant factors in the historical development of urban local government in Mauritius? Question 2: Give an account

Differences Between Cheques And Other Bills of Exchange However the following are some of such the differences between like cheques and such other bills of exchange: like;

Leon, a bank vice president, joined Fitness Center, Inc. (FC). He signed a contract stating, among other things, an exculpatory clause that FC

ali send an offer to bakar on 13/9/2010 by fax.on 14/9/2010 ali change his mind and revoke the offer by fax unfortunately bakar''s fax machine not working and ali call for bakar. b