Rule in foss v harbottle, Business Law and Ethics

RULE IN FOSS v HARBOTTLE:

 What has come to be recognized in company law as "the rule in Foss v Harbottle" is the decision of Vice-Chancellor Wigram in the case of Foss v Harbottle in which the facts, briefly, were as follows.

The plaintiffs, Foss and Turton, were shareholders in a company called The Victoria Park Co. which was formed by statute to buy land for use as a pleasure park. The defendants were the company's five directors and others.  The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants had defrauded the company in various ways, and in particular that certain of the defendants had sold land belonging to them to the company at an exorbitant price. They asked the court to order the defendants to make good the losses to the company and also sought the appointment of a receiver.

It was held that it was incompetent for the plaintiffs to bring such going on, the sole right to do so being that of the company in its corporate character.  The judge stated:

"In law the corporation and the aggregate members of the corporation are not the same thing for purposes like this; and the only question can be whether the facts alleged in this case justify a departure from the rule that, prima facie, would utilize that the corporation should sue in its own name and in its corporate character or in the name of someone whom the law has appointed to be its representative."

The judge eventually concluded that no departure from the rule was justified in the case before him.  The same rule was restated with more clarity by Lord Davey in Burland v Earle when he stated;

"In order to redress a wrong done to the company or to recover moneys or damages alleged to be due to the company, the action there should prima facie be brought by the company itself."

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 2:57:59 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Rule in foss v harbottle, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Rule in foss v harbottle, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Rule in foss v harbottle Discussions

Write discussion on Rule in foss v harbottle
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Rights of Guarantor Against the Debtor Therefore the guarantor's rights alongside the debtor are: like; (a) Before the payment has been made, whereas to compel the debtor t

F.O.B. Contracts - Import and Export Trade Under an f.o.b. like free on board contract it is the duty of like the seller to put the goods on board a ship to the purpose of the

Define the term - agenda amendments The solution to the above lies in the rules of policy or agenda amendments and the real weapon in the hands of the voter is their ability t

Trade Unions:                   Trade Unions are registered under s.11 of the Trade Unions Act 1952 with the primary object of regulating the  relations between employees and

Hire-Purchase Law A person who wants to buy goods through does not have the like "money consideration" prescribed through the Sale of Goods Act like their price may enter in a

Define  Accession and ratification Another area/aspect that needs to be highlighted with regards to a Treaty is the difference between signing and ratifying a particular treaty

Legal rights - Winding up: In substance these two people are really partners" and by analogy with the law of partnership (which permits dissolution if the partners are really

The concept of separate legal personality is fundamental to company law. With close reference to leading cases, explain this concept and its relationship to the doctrine of limit

Here, we have outlined the utility of National Building Code. We have explained the main features of Factories Act. Some of the provisions of Electricity Act and Rules which are re

Theories of international antitrust coordination We have come across various policy coordinations and adjustments but still there are other spheres of affairs where direct poli