Reducibility among problems, Theory of Computation

A common approach in solving problems is to transform them to different problems, solve the new ones, and derive the solutions for the original problems from those for the new ones. This approach is helpful when the new problems are simpler to solve, or when they usually have known algorithms for solving them. A similar approach is also very useful in the classification of problems according to their complexity.

Posted Date: 3/18/2013 1:13:50 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Reducibility among problems, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Reducibility among problems, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Reducibility among problems Discussions

Write discussion on Reducibility among problems
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Our DFAs are required to have exactly one edge incident from each state for each input symbol so there is a unique next state for every current state and input symbol. Thus, the ne

i have some questions in automata, can you please help me in solving in these questions?

We can then specify any language in the class of languages by specifying a particular automaton in the class of automata. We do that by specifying values for the parameters of the

design a tuning machine for penidrome

Computations are deliberate for processing information. Computability theory was discovered in the 1930s, and extended in the 1950s and 1960s. Its basic ideas have become part of

What is the Best way to write algorithm and construct flow chart? What is Computer? How to construct web page and Designe it?


1. An integer is said to be a “continuous factored” if it can be expresses as a product of two or more continuous integers greater than 1. Example of continuous factored integers

Our primary concern is to obtain a clear characterization of which languages are recognizable by strictly local automata and which aren't. The view of SL2 automata as generators le

Let L 3 = {a i bc j | i, j ≥ 0}. Give a strictly 2-local automaton that recognizes L 3 . Use the construction of the proof to extend the automaton to one that recognizes L 3 . Gi