Probability and expected utility, Game Theory

Assignment Help:

PROBABILITY AND EXPECTED UTILITY

Most students know the elementary combinatorial rules for probability algebra and need only a refresher with some exam- ples. We have used card examples; you can easily construct similar ones with coins or dice.

The concept of risk aversion is simple at an intuitive level, but its treatment using expected utility can be difficult to get across. We have found it useful to involve the students. Take a particular utility function, say the logarithmic, and calculate the sure prospect that gives the same utility as the expected utility of a particular lottery. The logarithmic utility function is shown in the diagram below, with payoffs on the vertical axis representing the log of the dollar amount on the horizontal axis:

1882_probability and expected utility.png

In this case, U(10) = 1 and U(100) = 2. One possible lottery to consider might be that in which there is a 50-50 chance of getting 10 or 100 (55 on average). With risk aversion, U(0.5 ´ 10 + 0.5 ´ 100) = 1.74 > 0.5 ´ U(10) +  0.5 ´ U(100). Rather, 0.5 ´ U(10) + 0.5 ´ U(100) = 1.5 = U(31.6). Thus, $31.60 gives the same amount of utility as the 50-50 lottery between $10 and $100 under  this utility function. Now ask for a vote on how many students would accept the sure  prospect  ($31.60)  and  how  many  the  lottery  (50% chance of $10 and 50% chance of $100). If a majority would accept the sure prospect, say, "Most of you seem more risk- averse than  this. Let us try a more concave function, say U(x) = -1/x" and repeat the experiment. You can use this process to try to find the risk aversion of the median student.

A few students get sufficiently intrigued by this to want more. If your class gets interested, and if you have time, you can talk about the history of the subject (St. Petersburg para- dox and all that) or about the recent work in psychology and economic theory on non-expected-utility approaches. For a discussion of the St. Petersburg paradox, or consider using the following simple example of the Allais paradox that can help students see that they do not always make choices consistent with maximizing their expected utility.

Describe first a choice between two lotteries: Lottery A pays $3,000 with probability 1 and Lottery B pays $0 with probability 0.2 and $4,000 with probability 0.8. Ask stu- dents to choose which lottery they would prefer to enter at a price of zero (and ask them to make note of their choices). Most choose A over B. Then describe a choice between two different lotteries: Lottery C pays $0 with probability 0.8 and

$4,000 with probability 0.2; Lottery D pays $0 with proba- bility 0.75 and $3,000 with probability 0.25. Again ask students to pick. Most choose C over D.

Now consider how the paired choices fit with the idea that people maximize expected utility. Set U(0) = 0. For those who chose A and C, this implies that EU(A) > EU(B) or that 1U(3,000) > 0.8U(4,000); but choosing C implies that EU(C) > EU(D) or that 0.2U(4,000) > 0.25U(3,000). The latter is equivalent to 0.8U(4,000) > 1U(3,000). This is in direct contradiction to the implication made when choos- ing A over B. Similar calculations can be used to show that those who choose B and D also violate the expected utility hypothesis. The choices of both A and D, or both B and C are consistent with maximization of expected utility.


Related Discussions:- Probability and expected utility

Mba , in a rectangular game pay off matrix of player a is as follows B1 B2 ...

in a rectangular game pay off matrix of player a is as follows B1 B2 A1 5 7 A2 4 0 salve the game write down the pay off matrix of B and then solve the game.

Airline ticket, why might an airline offer the following deal: you pay 400 ...

why might an airline offer the following deal: you pay 400 for a round trip ticket from here to orlando, but you only pay 300 per ticket if you stayy in orlando includes a saturday

Application of twenty one card game, This version of Twenty-one is a card g...

This version of Twenty-one is a card game played between a player and the dealer (the computer). The aim of the game is to accumulate a higher point total than the dealer but witho

Multiple item auction, Normal 0 false false false EN-US...

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE

Determine the pure strategy nash equilibria, a) Define the term Nash equili...

a) Define the term Nash equilibrium b) You are given the following pay-off matrix:   Strategies for player 1   Strategies for player 2

NAsh equilibrium, Consider a game in which player 1 chooses rows, player 2 ...

Consider a game in which player 1 chooses rows, player 2 chooses columns and player 3 chooses matrices. Only Player 3''s payoffs are given below. Show that D is not a best response

Payoffs, mixed strategy game with ordinal and cardinal payoffs example plea...

mixed strategy game with ordinal and cardinal payoffs example please

Bayes rule, Treating probability as a logic, Thomas Bayes defined the follo...

Treating probability as a logic, Thomas Bayes defined the following: Pr(X|Y)=Pr(Y|X)Pr(X)/Pr(Y) For example, probability that the weather was bad given that our friends playe

Reverse auction, While ancient auctions involve one seller and plenty of co...

While ancient auctions involve one seller and plenty of consumers, a reverse auction typically involves several sellers and one buyer. for instance, procurement auctions are used t

Identifying restrictions, In many cases we are interested in only one (or a...

In many cases we are interested in only one (or a few) of the equations of the model and attempts to measure its parameters statistically without a complete knowledge of the entire

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd