Legal rights - winding up, Business Law and Ethics

Legal rights - Winding up:

In substance these two people are really partners" and by analogy with the law of partnership (which permits dissolution if the partners are really unable to work together) it was just and equitable to order liquidation.

(a) The members or directors are associated in the company on the basis of certain understandings but one (or more) exercises his legal rights against another in breach of those understandings with results which are unfair.  Such situations are sometimes referred to as a "fraud on the minority"

                                                  Case: EBRAHIM v. WESTBOURNE GALLERIES (1973)

E and N carried on business together for 25 years, originally as partners and for the last 10 years through a company in which each originally had 500 shares.  E and N were the first directors and shared the profits as directors' remuneration; no dividends were paid.  When N's son joined the business he became a third director and E and N each transferred 100 shares to N's son.  Eventually there were disputes: N and his son used their voting control in general meeting (600 votes against 400) to remove E from his directorship under the power of removal given by Companies Act 1948 s.184 (Kenya, s.185).  E sued to have the company wound up.

Held:

The company should be wound up.  N and his son were within their legal rights in removing E from his directorship but the past relationship made it "unjust or inequitable" to insist on legal rights and the court could intervene on equitable principles to order liquidation.  E's petition for relief on grounds of oppression of minority failed since he failed to make out a strong enough case for such relief.

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 4:51:09 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Legal rights - winding up, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Legal rights - winding up, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Legal rights - winding up Discussions

Write discussion on Legal rights - winding up
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
QUESTION a) How is the term "investor" defined in the Investment Promotion Act? b) In what ways can the Board of Investment (BOI) assist in business facilitation and Public-Pr

Question 1 The doctrine laid down in Salomon v Salomon & Co. Ltd has to be watched very carefully. The Courts can and often do draw aside the veil. Discuss. Question 2

Question 1: How does Kelsen distinguish between the act of a gang of robbers and the act of a tax authority? Question 2: Referring to legal theorists you have studied,

State the International policy coordination In an international context governments can, in theory, offset adverse spillover effects originating from other nations. With fewer

Q. Indicator based definition of phoenix activity? Many stakeholders emphasised the importance of educating the community about the signs or indicators of phoenix activity. A d

DISADVANTAGES: Whether delegated or subsidiary legislation has been criticised just to a variety of reasons, the main ones being that it is:as; (a)   Less democratic Whe

State about the Median Voter Theorem Percentage of vote necessary for a proposal to be adopted, remember Median Voter Theorem, will affect the difficult of adopting a proposal,

Fundamentals of Public Health Law The Honorable Art Vandelay has been a member of the U.S. Congress for 10 years, representing the 12th District in South Caledonia. Through hi

Explanatory statement - mergers and winding up: It is also necessary that the members or creditors who are to vote on the scheme should be able to understand its full effects.

Question: i) Sheilana has worked for Tuna Canning Ltd for 15 years. Last Monday Sheilana was called to the Manager's Office and verbally informed that her employment was term