Legal rights - winding up, Business Law and Ethics

Legal rights - Winding up:

In substance these two people are really partners" and by analogy with the law of partnership (which permits dissolution if the partners are really unable to work together) it was just and equitable to order liquidation.

(a) The members or directors are associated in the company on the basis of certain understandings but one (or more) exercises his legal rights against another in breach of those understandings with results which are unfair.  Such situations are sometimes referred to as a "fraud on the minority"

                                                  Case: EBRAHIM v. WESTBOURNE GALLERIES (1973)

E and N carried on business together for 25 years, originally as partners and for the last 10 years through a company in which each originally had 500 shares.  E and N were the first directors and shared the profits as directors' remuneration; no dividends were paid.  When N's son joined the business he became a third director and E and N each transferred 100 shares to N's son.  Eventually there were disputes: N and his son used their voting control in general meeting (600 votes against 400) to remove E from his directorship under the power of removal given by Companies Act 1948 s.184 (Kenya, s.185).  E sued to have the company wound up.

Held:

The company should be wound up.  N and his son were within their legal rights in removing E from his directorship but the past relationship made it "unjust or inequitable" to insist on legal rights and the court could intervene on equitable principles to order liquidation.  E's petition for relief on grounds of oppression of minority failed since he failed to make out a strong enough case for such relief.

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 4:51:09 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Legal rights - winding up, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Legal rights - winding up, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Legal rights - winding up Discussions

Write discussion on Legal rights - winding up
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
CREDITORS' VOLUNTARY WINDING UP: If no declaration of solvency is made and delivered to the registrar, the liquidation process is a creditors' voluntary winding up even if i

Bulky and technical Bills: In fact some Bills are so bulky and technical hence they are passed without sufficient debate it means Parliament lacks the time and knowledge to th

Define the term - social attainment and economic growth Many problems can also be seen either as private problem for those who experience them or as public policy failures that

Issuing shares at a discount: In Ooregum Gold Mining Co of India Ltd v Roper (45) the House of Lords held that it is illegal for a limited company to issue its shares at a dis

Financial Year of Holding Company and Subsidiary: S.153(1) provides that a holding company's directors shall ensure that, except where in their opinion there are good reasons

JURISDICTION  According to Peter Stephen Du Ponceau, an international lawyer from Philadelphia, Jurisdiction, in its most general sense means; "The power to make, declare, o

On which convention International humanitarian law is based International humanitarian law  is  not  wholly  based  on  the  Geneva  Convention and  Hague convention. These law

QUESTION 1 The doctrine laid down in Salomon v Salomon & Co. Ltd has to be watched very carefully. The Courts can and often do draw aside the veil. Discuss QUESTION 2 (

Question 1: Constructive dismissal is inherently different from dismissal in the sense that it is the employee who takes the initiative in considering the contract as having be

Group Accounts: Section 150 requires a company which has subsidiaries to lay before the company in general meeting accounts or  statements dealing with the state of affairs an