Legal rights - winding up, Business Law and Ethics

Legal rights - Winding up:

In substance these two people are really partners" and by analogy with the law of partnership (which permits dissolution if the partners are really unable to work together) it was just and equitable to order liquidation.

(a) The members or directors are associated in the company on the basis of certain understandings but one (or more) exercises his legal rights against another in breach of those understandings with results which are unfair.  Such situations are sometimes referred to as a "fraud on the minority"

                                                  Case: EBRAHIM v. WESTBOURNE GALLERIES (1973)

E and N carried on business together for 25 years, originally as partners and for the last 10 years through a company in which each originally had 500 shares.  E and N were the first directors and shared the profits as directors' remuneration; no dividends were paid.  When N's son joined the business he became a third director and E and N each transferred 100 shares to N's son.  Eventually there were disputes: N and his son used their voting control in general meeting (600 votes against 400) to remove E from his directorship under the power of removal given by Companies Act 1948 s.184 (Kenya, s.185).  E sued to have the company wound up.

Held:

The company should be wound up.  N and his son were within their legal rights in removing E from his directorship but the past relationship made it "unjust or inequitable" to insist on legal rights and the court could intervene on equitable principles to order liquidation.  E's petition for relief on grounds of oppression of minority failed since he failed to make out a strong enough case for such relief.

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 4:51:09 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Legal rights - winding up, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Legal rights - winding up, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Legal rights - winding up Discussions

Write discussion on Legal rights - winding up
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
DISCLAIMER OF ASSETS: The liquidator has a statutory right of disclaimer of assets: s.135.  The rules are: (a)     he must obtain leave of the court; (b)     the right o

Registration of Resolutions: By S.143(1) a printed copy of the following resolutions shall, within 30 days after the passing thereof, be delivered to the registrar for registr

Defendant, Jones, is charged with several counts of possession of drugs and weapons. In the early morning hours, a 911 caller reported: "I hear a loud disturbance from Joe Jones' a

Q. Approaches to defining phoenix activity? There are a number of approaches to defining phoenix activity that could be used. These approaches are summarised below. It should b

Question 1: (a) Describe any five topics in employee relations from the following: Employee Engagement, Workplace Investigations, Employee Satisfaction, Performance Management,

When operating a business, an owner has to make numerous decisions on a daily basis. In some cases, a decision may increase profits, but the owner is uncomfortable making such a de

LEGAL LIABILITY FOR LABORATORY ACCIDENTS IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS : As mentioned in some of the earlier sections, law is not directly available to decide legal liability for la

Duties or Obligations of Hirer However these are not provided in the Act although are usually found in such the agreement itself Like: a) Take delivery: whether upon ente

Defining phoenix activity in legislation Some stakeholders noted that defining phoenix activity in legislation could be beneficial if the definition was appropriate and it was

Liability of Maker of a Promissory Conversely S.89 provides such with the maker of a promissory notice through making it: like (a) Engages such he will pay it according to