Important points - contractual capacity of drunken persons, Business Law and Ethics

Important points - Contractual Capacity of Drunken Persons

Here the following points should be notice for as:

  • Ratification

Well a drunken man who enters into a voidable contract may ratify  or affirm it whether he is sober as Matthews v. Baxter whereas the defendant was held liable to breach of contract for buy some houses from the plaintiff that he had made whenever he was drunk but had nevertheless confirmed or satisfied after he became sober.

  • Necessaries

However a drunken person is liable to pay to necessaries supplied for him pursuant to a contract such he entered into whether too drunk to know whatever he was usually doing: Gore v. Gibson  whether as Alderson, B. stated like the ground of liability is an implied contract for pay to the goods such arose from his conduct whereas sober.

  • Moreover the drunken person is liable for pay "a reasonable price" by under S.4 of the Sale of Goods Act. Well he is not liable to the agreed price - apparently since, being drunk that he could not know the correct or for fair price of the goods.
Posted Date: 1/22/2013 2:33:00 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Important points - contractual capacity of drunken persons, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Important points - contractual capacity of drunken persons, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Important points - contractual capacity of drunken persons Discussions

Write discussion on Important points - contractual capacity of drunken persons
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Types of Precedents There a precedent may be as; A binding precedent here judge must tag along whereas he approves of it or not. Hence it is excludes his judicial discr

Disadvantages of Statute Law: Imposition of law However some Acts are imposed on the people and reflect the views of the pundits or Executive in the ruling political part

Doctrine of "Constructive Notice":  The doctrine of "constructive notice" is a rule of company law to the effect that a person transacting business with a company is taken to

Act defined a traffic indication: However in EVANS v CROSS, Evans was charged by ignoring namely, a traffic sign, a white line painted in the middle of a road, whether overtak

Transactions Arising In A Liquidation: In collection in and realisation of assets in order to pay the company's debts and then to distribute any surplus to members the liquida

Question 1: (a) Explain what is meant by Subsidiary Legislation and the reasons for using such a Law. (b) Explain the ways in which Subsidiary Legislation is controlled.

Use of shares of the minority: X, Y and Z held 4,500, 4,500 and 1,000 one pound shares respectively, of Company B.  They were the only shareholders and  X and Y were the direc

QUESTION 1 The doctrine laid down in Salomon v Salomon & Co. Ltd has to be watched very carefully. The Courts can and often do draw aside the veil. Discuss QUESTION 2 (

Question 1: What do you consider to have been the significant factors in the historical development of urban local government in Mauritius? Question 2: Give an account

Need for research Design: a. It facilities the smooth sailing of the various research operations thereby making research as efficient as possible yielding maximal inf