Gist of lord buckleys statement, Business Law and Ethics

Gist of Lord Buckleys statement:

The gist of Lord Buckley's statement, above, may be summarised as follows: The judges will not regard a transaction undertaken by a company as ultra vires merely because it is not written in the company's memorandum of association as one of the company's objects. They would in fact regard the transaction as intra vires by implication if -

i.   it was reasonably incidental to any of the objects which have been written in the company's memorandum of association, and.

ii. It was undertaken for the sole purpose of effectuating, or achieving, the written objects, or any of them.

Regarding the criteria to be used when deciding on whether a proposed transaction is "reasonably incidental" to the objects written in the memorandum, it was stated in Henderson v Bank of Australia (1888) that what other companies with similar objects do may be a good guide for a company regarding its implied powers. But it appears that, provided a transaction is decided on by the company (at a board or general meeting) in the bona fide belief that its pursuit would enable the company to get more customers or do more business, the court would not regard the transaction as ultra vires even though it may doubt its "reasonableness".

Posted Date: 1/12/2013 2:34:51 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Gist of lord buckleys statement, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Gist of lord buckleys statement, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Gist of lord buckleys statement Discussions

Write discussion on Gist of lord buckleys statement
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Q. Cross agency actions - addressing phoenix activity? the ASIC, ATO and FWO all have responsibilities in investigating and monitoring elements of phoenix activity. This means

Issue of additional preference shares: In the Bristol Aeroplane Case it was said of the issue of additional preference shares that:                    "the existing prefere

QUESTION (a) What do you understand by the term misconduct in employment law. How does the English definition of misconduct differs from the French definition of misconduct?

Order for compulsory liquidation: The Official Receiver also calls separate meetings of creditors and of contributories within one month of the order for liquidation: s.236.

QUESTION 1 Discuss the functions of the following- (a) The Workfare Programme (b) The Advisory Council for Occupational Safety and Health (c) Health and Safety Officer

DUTIES OF AUDITORS: The duties of auditors are explained in the following cases. 1. RE: KINGSTON COTTON MILL CO. (1896)(CHANCERY) For some years before a company was wou

PROOF OF DEBTS:                                       Many of the rules of bankruptcy apply to the discharge of the company's debts: s.310.  The liquidator must obviously requ

Return As To Allotments: Section 54 (1) provides that whenever a company limited by shares or a company limited by guarantee and having a share capital makes any allotment of

Question1 Describe the term banking and what are the permitted businesses for a banking company as per BR Act 1949 Question2 When is a negotiable instrument considered as

"Detriment" as consideration  An example of a 'detriment' that will legally suffice like the consideration for a promise is provided with the case of Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke