Fundamental sets of solutions, Mathematics

The time has at last come to describe "nice enough". We've been using this term during the last few sections to explain those solutions which could be used to form a general solution and this is now time to officially describe it.

First, since everything that we're going to be doing here only needs linear and homogeneous we won't need constant coefficients in our differential equation. Thus, let's start with the subsequent IVP.

p (t ) y′′ + q (t ) y′ + r (t ) y = 0   ............. (1)

 y (t0)= y0

 y′ (t0) = y0

Let's also assume that we have already got two solutions to this differential equation, y1(t) and y2(t). We identify from the Principle of Superposition as

 y (t ) = c1 y1 (t) + c2 y2 (t)    ................(2)

That will also be a solution to the differential equation.  What we need to know is whether or not it will be a general solution. So as for (2) to be considered a general solution this must satisfy the general initial conditions in (1).

 y (t0)= y0

 y′ (t0) = y0

 It will also imply that any solution to the differential equation can be written in form of.

Therefore, let's see if we can get constants which will satisfy these conditions. First differentiate (2) and plug in the initial conditions.

 y0 = y (t0) = c1 y1 (t0) + c2 y2 (t0)

y0′ = y′ (t0) = c1 y1′ (t0 ) + c2 y2′ (t0)    .................. (3)

As we are assuming that we've already found the two solutions everything under this system is technically identified and so it is a system which can be solved for c1 and c2. It can be done in general using Cramer's Rule.  By using Cramer's Rule provides the following solution.

2026_Fundamental Sets of Solutions.png



2092_Fundamental Sets of Solutions1.png

It is the determinant of a 2x2 matrix. If you don't identify about determinants which is okay, just utilize the formula that we've given above.

Now, (4) will provide the solution to the system (3). Remember that in practice we usually don't use Cramer's Rule to solve systems; we simply proceed in a straightforward way and solve the system using fundamental algebra techniques. Therefore, why did we use Cramer's Rule here so?

We used Cramer's Rule as we can use (4) to extend a condition which will permit us to determine when we can resolve for the constants. All three, here the denominators are the same that are use, of the quantities in (4) are just numbers and the only thing which will prevent us from in fact getting a solution will be while the denominator is zero.

The quantity in the denominator is termed as the Wronskian and is denoted as,

W(f,g) (t) =

574_Fundamental Sets of Solutions3.png

= f(t) g'(t) - g(t) f'(t)

So, assume that y1(t) and y2(t) are two solutions to (1) and that W ( y1 , y2)(t)  ≠ 0.  After that the two solutions are termed as a fundamental set of solutions and the general solution to (1) is

y (t ) = c1 y1 (t ) + c2 y2 (t )

We know here what "nice enough" means. Here two solutions are "nice enough" if they are a basic set of solutions.

Therefore, let's check one of the claims which we made in a previous section. We'll leave another two to you to check if you'd like to.

Posted Date: 4/10/2013 5:19:40 AM | Location : United States

Related Discussions:- Fundamental sets of solutions, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Fundamental sets of solutions, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Fundamental sets of solutions Discussions

Write discussion on Fundamental sets of solutions
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
If ABC is an obtuse angled triangle, obtuse angled at B and if AD⊥CB Prove that AC 2 =AB 2 + BC 2 +2BCxBD Ans:    AC 2 = AD 2 + CD 2 = AD 2 + (BC + BD) 2 = A

(1) Prove that Zorn's lemma is equivalent to axiom of choice. (2) Use Zorn's Lemma to prove the existence of E.

Q. Define Degrees and Radians? Ans. Just as your height can be measured in meters or feet and your weight can be measured in pounds or kilograms, angles can be measured in

What lines are invariant under the transformation [(103)(01-4)(001)]? I do not know where to even begin to solve this. Please help!!

Given a standard 2x3 matrix show the ideal formed by the 2x2 minors is Prime.

Kyra receives a 5% commission on every car she sells. She received a $1,325 commission on the last car she sold. What was the cost of the car? Use the proportion part/whole =

Tests for relative minimum For a relative minimum point there are two tests: i.The first derivative, which is (dy)/(dx)  = f´(x) = 0 ii.The second derivative, which i

An initial species population is y(0) = 3000. At t=0 the population starts to grow exponentially with a doubling time of 2 years. Mark the only correct statement: a)    The per

Demonstrates that f ( x ) = 4 x 5 + x 3 + 7 x - 2 has accurately one real root. Solution From basic Algebra principles we know that since f (x) is a 5 th degree polynomi

I need answers for these 10 exam questions: 1.Input-output (Leontief) model: main assumptions and construction. Definition of productivity. Necessary condition of productivity of i