Fraudulent trading, Business Law and Ethics

Fraudulent Trading:

Under s.323, if the court finds that the business of a company in liquidation has been carried on with intent to defraud creditors or for any fraudulent purpose it may declare that any persons who were knowingly parties to carrying on the business in this fashion shall be liable for debts of the company as the court may decide.

It has been said that "if a company continues to carry on business and to incur debts at a time when there is to the knowledge of the directors no reasonable prospect of the creditors receiving payment of those debts, it is, in general, a proper inference that the company is carrying on business with intent to "defraud" (per Maugham J. in William C Leitch Bros (No 1)(1932).  But in another case the same judge said that there must be evidence of "real dishonesty".

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 5:43:40 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Fraudulent trading, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Fraudulent trading, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Fraudulent trading Discussions

Write discussion on Fraudulent trading
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
What is the territorial sovereignty The territorial sovereignty includes the land territory, the territorial sea, the seabed and the subsoil of the territorial sea. It also inc

CASE LAW:    The aforesaid statutory provisions for the protection of minorities have been supplemented by judicial intervention in a variety of cases which are generally expl

As a senior HR officer in Catastrophe Concepts HR department, you have been asked by George Chapel to prepare a management briefing regarding the situation. Your report should:

Division of company's Powers: Article 80 of Table A states: "The business of the company shall be managed by the directors one who may... exercise all the such powers of th

Question: a. An Ethical dilemma is a complex situation that often involves an apparent mental conflict between moral imperatives, in which to obey one would result in transgre

Question 1: "Constructive Dismissal is inherently different from dismissal in the sense that it is the employee who necessarily takes the initiative in considering the contrac

Normal 0 false false false EN-IN X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

Stakeholders felt the working definition was broadly appropriate. It was also noted that the Treasury definition, used as the working definition, has been endorsed by the ATO. A nu

Common law systems such as that in the United States rely on prior decisions as a principal source for determining cases as they arise. a) What are the five ways that precedents

Service of Notice: Section 134 (a) provides that, unless the articles of the company make other provision in that behalf, notice of the meeting of a company shall be served on