Fitness for Purpose - Sales of Goods
However that goods such are bought for a particular purpose that are reasonably fit about that purpose:(S.16 (a))like Whether this condition is implied only if: like;
Baldry v Marshall (36) like in the purpose was expressly made just known to that seller.
Priest v Last (37) in the purpose was deemed for have been impliedly made just known to seller there.
Since Section 16 (a) contains the words like "whereas he be the manufacturer or not" like the case of as Frost v Aylesbury Dairy Company (38) whereas shows such the liability which it imposes is never restricted to manufactured goods then and may, should in appropriate cases, apply just to non-manufactured goods like well. Perhaps that is presumably so then the words are put in such brackets.
Therefore the seller would not be liable whether he proves such the goods were sold below a patent or other trade name like such was explained in as Bristol Tramway Company Limited v Fiat Motors (39) like so and such the buyer did not rely at his skill and judgement, such explained in like Baldry v Marshall (36) also.