Executory Consideration - Types of Consideration

Although Executory consideration consists of a promise made about one party and a promise made through the other party to the contract.  Thus the party exchange mutual promises.  Since performance of the obligations remain in futura.  Well it is good considerations about support a claim.

Examples

Some conditions are as follow:

1. Whereas an unmarried man and a lady agree to be married in the near future. But nothing has been done yet then there is a contract to marry between them from the moment so they exchange their promises. Well the lady's promise is the price that she pays for the man's promise, and such the man's promise is the price he pays to the lady's promise.
2. Second is Onyango goes to Munene's shop on the tenth day to the month and asks Munene, a tailor, for make a suit for him. Then he promises to pay for the suit on the end of the month. Munene takes Onyango's measurements and promises for have the suit ready on the last day to the month.

However Onyango's promise is the consideration or price to Munene's promises so, and Munene's promise is the consideration or price with Onyango's promise.

Posted Date: 1/22/2013 2:47:05 AM | Location : United States

Ask an Expert

Related Discussions:- Executory consideration - types of consideration, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Executory consideration - types of consideration, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Executory consideration - types of consideration Discussions

Write discussion on Executory consideration - types of consideration
Your posts are moderated

Write your message here..

Related Questions

Approval of the scheme - mergers and winding up, Approval of the scheme - m... Approval of the scheme - mergers and winding up: A scheme of arrangement was agreed between Hambros and Hellenic whereby the shareholders of Hellenic were to have their shares

Importance of sound public opinion in public policy making, Question 1: ... Question 1: "Defining the problems of society and ensuring that they are placed on the governmental agenda constitutes the most important stage of policy making process." Discu

State article 16 of international law, State Article 16 of international la... State Article 16 of international law Article 16, states that a newly independent State is not bound to maintain in force, or to become a party to, any treaty by reason only of

Differences between cheques and other bills of exchange, Differences Betwee... Differences Between Cheques And Other Bills of Exchange However the following are some of such the differences between like cheques and such other bills of exchange: like;

Skills of legal writing, You are a Graduate Legal Officer employed in the C... You are a Graduate Legal Officer employed in the Constitutional Policy Unit of the Australian Attorney-General's Department. Until this point, your supervisor, Rodger Dodger, has p

Relationship of partners inter se, Relationship of Partners Inter Se W... Relationship of Partners Inter Se Whether various terms are in utilize to denote the different specification of partners.  Then the most central of these terms are like: (

Recognition of government, Recognition of government It relates to reco... Recognition of government It relates to recognition of a government of a particular State as the legitimate representative of the people of that country. The recognition of gov

Contents of group accounts, Contents of Group Accounts: By s.152(1), t... Contents of Group Accounts: By s.152(1), the group accounts laid before a company shall give a true and fair view of the state of affairs and profit or loss of the company and

Legislation and legislative functions, Question : This is an extract of... Question : This is an extract of the Mauritian Patents, Industrial Design and Trademarks Act 2002. 12. Patentable inventions (1) An invention shall be patentable under

Rule in foss v harbottle, RULE IN FOSS v HARBOTTLE:  What has come to ... RULE IN FOSS v HARBOTTLE:  What has come to be recognized in company law as "the rule in Foss v Harbottle" is the decision of Vice-Chancellor Wigram in the case of Foss v Harb