Deterministic finite state automaton, Theory of Computation

De?nition Deterministic Finite State Automaton: For any state set Q and alphabet Σ, both ?nite, a ?nite state automaton (FSA) over Q

and

Σ is a ?ve-tuple (Q,Σ, T, q0, F), where:

• T ⊆ Q × Q × Σ,

• q0 ∈ Q is the initial state (also know as the start state) and

• F ⊆ Q is the set of accepting states (also spuriously known as ?nal states).

The FSA is deterministic (a DFA) if for all q ∈ Q and σ ∈ Σ, there is exactly one p ∈ Q such that (q, p, σ) ∈ T.

Each triple in T = hq, p, σi represents an edge from state q to p labeled σ in the transition graph. The state q0 is the initial state of the transition graph (marked by the "edge from nowhere") and the states in F are the states distinguished by being circled. An FSA is deterministic if there is never any choice of what the next state is, given the current state and input symbol and there is never no choice. In terms of the transition graph, this means that every node will have exactly one out-edge for each symbol of the alphabet.

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 3:29:19 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Deterministic finite state automaton, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Deterministic finite state automaton, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Deterministic finite state automaton Discussions

Write discussion on Deterministic finite state automaton
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
spam messages h= 98%, m= 90%, l= 80% non spam h=12%, m = 8%, l= 5% The organization estimates that 75% of all messages it receives are spam messages. If the cost of not blocking a

i want to do projects for theory of computation subject what topics should be best.

This close relationship between the SL2 languages and the recognizable languages lets us use some of what we know about SL 2 to discover properties of the recognizable languages.

write short notes on decidable and solvable problem

In Exercise 9 you showed that the recognition problem and universal recognition problem for SL2 are decidable. We can use the structure of Myhill graphs to show that other problems

When we say "solved algorithmically" we are not asking about a speci?c programming language, in fact one of the theorems in computability is that essentially all reasonable program

For example, the question of whether a given regular language is positive (does not include the empty string) is algorithmically decidable. "Positiveness Problem". Note that

Let L1 and L2 be CGF. We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG too. Let M1 be a decider for L1 and M2 be a decider for L2 . Consider a 2-tape TM M: "On input x: 1. copy x on the sec


We got the class LT by taking the class SL and closing it under Boolean operations. We have observed that LT ⊆ Recog, so certainly any Boolean combination of LT languages will also