Deterministic finite state automaton, Theory of Computation

De?nition Deterministic Finite State Automaton: For any state set Q and alphabet Σ, both ?nite, a ?nite state automaton (FSA) over Q

and

Σ is a ?ve-tuple (Q,Σ, T, q0, F), where:

• T ⊆ Q × Q × Σ,

• q0 ∈ Q is the initial state (also know as the start state) and

• F ⊆ Q is the set of accepting states (also spuriously known as ?nal states).

The FSA is deterministic (a DFA) if for all q ∈ Q and σ ∈ Σ, there is exactly one p ∈ Q such that (q, p, σ) ∈ T.

Each triple in T = hq, p, σi represents an edge from state q to p labeled σ in the transition graph. The state q0 is the initial state of the transition graph (marked by the "edge from nowhere") and the states in F are the states distinguished by being circled. An FSA is deterministic if there is never any choice of what the next state is, given the current state and input symbol and there is never no choice. In terms of the transition graph, this means that every node will have exactly one out-edge for each symbol of the alphabet.

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 3:29:19 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Deterministic finite state automaton, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Deterministic finite state automaton, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Deterministic finite state automaton Discussions

Write discussion on Deterministic finite state automaton
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions

The k-local Myhill graphs provide an easy means to generalize the suffix substitution closure property for the strictly k-local languages. Lemma (k-Local Suffix Substitution Clo

distinguish between histogram and historigram

what problems are tackled under numerical integration

write short notes on decidable and solvable problem

A context free grammar G = (N, Σ, P, S)  is in binary form if for all productions A we have |α| ≤ 2. In addition we say that G is in Chomsky Normaml Form (CNF) if it is in bi

let G=(V,T,S,P) where V={a,b,A,B,S}, T={a,b},S the start symbol and P={S->Aba, A->BB, B->ab,AB->b} 1.show the derivation sentence for the string ababba 2. find a sentential form

Intuitively, closure of SL 2 under intersection is reasonably easy to see, particularly if one considers the Myhill graphs of the automata. Any path through both graphs will be a

S-->AAA|B A-->aA|B B-->epsilon

It is not hard to see that ε-transitions do not add to the accepting power of the model. The underlying idea is that whenever an ID (q, σ  v) directly computes another (p, v) via