Combining simultaneous and sequential moves, Game Theory

Combining Simultaneous and Sequential Moves

The material in this chapter covers a variety of issues that require some knowledge of the analysis of both sequential- move and simultaneous-move games. Only one section deals with mixed strategies, so it is possible to present most of the material here after having introduced simultaneous-move games but before introducing mixing. We have used this approach in our own teaching.

To address rule changes in games, you will want to draw on examples used in previous class periods. We focus on the different outcomes that can arise when rules are changed. When a game is changed from simultaneous move to sequential move, for example, the change can create a first or second mover advantage. Games like the battle of the two cultures or chicken have first-mover advantages in their sequential move versions; the tennis-point example has a second-mover advantage in its sequential-move version. Other games show no change in equilibrium as a result of the change in rules; games like the prisoners' dilemma, in which both players have dominant strategies, fall into this category.

Similarly, changing a game from sequential play to simul- taneous play can mean that new equilibria arise-either multiple equilibria or equilibria in mixed strategies. Use the sequential-game examples you used to convey the material to show that there might be additional equilibria in the simultaneous-move versions of the game. This works for the tennis-point game if you teach it as a sequential game or for the three-person voting example from Ordeshook.

The most interesting component of the analysis is the representation of sequential-move games in strategic form and the solution of such games from that form. The second (and third) mover's strategies are more complex in sequential games, and the payoff table must have adequate rows (or columns or pages) to accommodate all of the pos- sible contingent strategies available to players. Again, the tennis-point or voting examples can be used to illustrate this idea. One nice exercise is to assert the existence of a new number of Nash equilibria in the strategic form and to show how one or two of these qualify as Nash equilibria; then use successive elim- ination of dominated strategies on the game to arrive at one cell of the table as the single reasonable equilibrium of the game. This helps motivate the idea of subgame perfection. Once you have shown that there may be multiple equilibria but that you can reduce the set of possible equilibria to one by eliminating (weakly) dominated strategies, you can show that the strategies associated with that one equilibrium coin- cide with the strategies found using rollback on the extensive form of the game. Students often have difficulty grasping the idea that the eliminated equilibria are unreasonable be- cause of the strategies associated with them rather than because of the (often) lower payoffs going to the players, so you will want to reinforce this idea as often as possible.

In addition to the examples used in previous chapters, you might want to make use of the game. This game can be played using either simultaneous or sequential moves, and there are several ways in which the sequential-move game can be set up; thus you have an opportunity to discuss rule changes as well as order changes. Also, the Boeing-Airbus example from can be used to show how multiple equilibria can arise when sequential-play games are repre- sented in strategic form. This is another way to show, with a smaller payoff table, that all subgame-perfect equilibria areNash equilibria but that not all Nash equilibria are subgame perfect. This example is also useful for explaining why Boeing's threat to fight if Airbus enters is not credible. This concept will be developed in more detail and used extensively in Chapter 9, so it is useful to introduce it before.

Posted Date: 9/27/2012 4:26:51 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Combining simultaneous and sequential moves, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Combining simultaneous and sequential moves, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Combining simultaneous and sequential moves Discussions

Write discussion on Combining simultaneous and sequential moves
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
A bidding increment is defined by the auctioneer as the least amount above the previous bid that a new bid must be in order to be adequate to the auctioneer. For example, if the in

James and Dean are playing the Chicken game. They have noticed that their payout for being perceived as "tough" depends on the size of the crowd. The larger the crowd, the "cooler"

(a) Equilibrium payoffs are (1, 0). Player A’s equilibrium strategy is S; B’s equilibrium strategy is “t if N.”   For (a): Player A has two strategies: (1) N or (2) S. P

Scenario Two corporations should simultaneously elect a technology to use for his or her compatible merchandise. If the corporations adopt totally different standards, few sales


GAME 4 Auctioning a Penny Jar (Winner’s Curse) Show a jar of pennies; pass it around so each student can have a closer look and form an estimate of the contents. Show the stud

Winner of the Nobel Prize in 1972, Hicks is acknowledged mutually of the leading economists normally equilibrium theory. he's credited with the introduction of the notion of elasti

Named when Vilfredo Pareto, Pareto optimality may be alive of potency. An outcome of a game is Pareto optimal if there's no different outcome that produces each player a minimum of

1  A, Explain how a person can be free to choose but his or her choices are casually determined by past event 2  B , Draw the casual tree for newcomb's problem when Eve can't pe

You and an opponent are seated at a table, and on the table is a square board. At each of the four corners of the board, there is a disc, each one red on one side and black on the