Class of local languages is not closed under union, Theory of Computation

Both L1 and L2 are SL2. (You should verify this by thinking about what the automata look like.)

2360_Class of local languages is not closed under union.png

We claim that L1 ∪ L2 ∈ SL2. To see this, suppose, by way of contradiction, that it was SL2. Then it would satisfy Suffx Substitution Closure. But abb ∈ L1 ∪ L2, since it is in L1, and bba ∈ L1 ∪ L2, since it is in L2, and, by Suffx Substitution Closure, this implies that aba ∈ L1 ∪ L2, which is not the case. Hence, L1 ∪ L2 is not SL2.

It's important to not misunderstand the weight of this result. It does not show that every union of two SL2 languages is not SL2-after all, the union of any SL2 language with itself must, necessarily, be SL2. It is easy to come up with pairs of distinct SL2 languages which yield an SL2 union as well,

1737_Class of local languages is not closed under union1.png

What it does say is that one can't count on the union of SL2 languages being SL2. This is in contrast to the closure result for intersection, which lets us build up languages out of simpler SL2 languages using intersection with con?dence that the result will be SL2. Showing that our desired language is the union of some simple SL2 languages doesn't help us. The result may or may not be SL.

Posted Date: 3/22/2013 12:53:40 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Class of local languages is not closed under union, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Class of local languages is not closed under union, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Class of local languages is not closed under union Discussions

Write discussion on Class of local languages is not closed under union
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions

Find the Regular Grammar for the following Regular Expression: a(a+b)*(ab*+ba*)b.

The computation of an SL 2 automaton A = ( Σ, T) on a string w is the maximal sequence of IDs in which each sequential pair of IDs is related by |- A and which starts with the in

Suppose G = (N, Σ, P, S) is a reduced grammar (we can certainly reduce G if we haven't already). Our algorithm is as follows: 1. Define maxrhs(G) to be the maximum length of the

Ask question #hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhMinimum 100 words accepted#

LTO was the closure of LT under concatenation and Boolean operations which turned out to be identical to SF, the closure of the ?nite languages under union, concatenation and compl


Construct a Mealy machine that can output EVEN or ODD According to the total no. of 1''s encountered is even or odd.

The universe of strings is a very useful medium for the representation of information as long as there exists a function that provides the interpretation for the information carrie

One might assume that non-closure under concatenation would imply non closure under both Kleene- and positive closure, since the concatenation of a language with itself is included