Class of local languages is not closed under union, Theory of Computation

Both L1 and L2 are SL2. (You should verify this by thinking about what the automata look like.)

2360_Class of local languages is not closed under union.png

We claim that L1 ∪ L2 ∈ SL2. To see this, suppose, by way of contradiction, that it was SL2. Then it would satisfy Suffx Substitution Closure. But abb ∈ L1 ∪ L2, since it is in L1, and bba ∈ L1 ∪ L2, since it is in L2, and, by Suffx Substitution Closure, this implies that aba ∈ L1 ∪ L2, which is not the case. Hence, L1 ∪ L2 is not SL2.

It's important to not misunderstand the weight of this result. It does not show that every union of two SL2 languages is not SL2-after all, the union of any SL2 language with itself must, necessarily, be SL2. It is easy to come up with pairs of distinct SL2 languages which yield an SL2 union as well,

1737_Class of local languages is not closed under union1.png

What it does say is that one can't count on the union of SL2 languages being SL2. This is in contrast to the closure result for intersection, which lets us build up languages out of simpler SL2 languages using intersection with con?dence that the result will be SL2. Showing that our desired language is the union of some simple SL2 languages doesn't help us. The result may or may not be SL.

Posted Date: 3/22/2013 12:53:40 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Class of local languages is not closed under union, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Class of local languages is not closed under union, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Class of local languages is not closed under union Discussions

Write discussion on Class of local languages is not closed under union
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Exercise:  Give a construction that converts a strictly 2-local automaton for a language L into one that recognizes the language L r . Justify the correctness of your construction.

how to find whether the language is cfl or not?


Another way of interpreting a strictly local automaton is as a generator: a mechanism for building strings which is restricted to building all and only the automaton as an inexh

. On July 1, 2010, Harris Co. issued 6,000 bonds at $1,000 each. The bonds paid interest semiannually at 5%. The bonds had a term of 20 years. At the time of issuance, the market r

The Equivalence Problem is the question of whether two languages are equal (in the sense of being the same set of strings). An instance is a pair of ?nite speci?cations of regular

Let L1 and L2 be CGF. We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG too. Let M1 be a decider for L1 and M2 be a decider for L2 . Consider a 2-tape TM M: "On input x: 1. copy x on the sec

All that distinguishes the de?nition of the class of Regular languages from that of the class of Star-Free languages is that the former is closed under Kleene closure while the lat

The generalization of the interpretation of strictly local automata as generators is similar, in some respects, to the generalization of Myhill graphs. Again, the set of possible s

Distinguish between Mealy and Moore Machine? Construct a Mealy machine that can output EVEN or ODD According to the total no. of 1's encountered is even or odd.