Class of local languages is not closed under union, Theory of Computation

Both L1 and L2 are SL2. (You should verify this by thinking about what the automata look like.)

2360_Class of local languages is not closed under union.png

We claim that L1 ∪ L2 ∈ SL2. To see this, suppose, by way of contradiction, that it was SL2. Then it would satisfy Suffx Substitution Closure. But abb ∈ L1 ∪ L2, since it is in L1, and bba ∈ L1 ∪ L2, since it is in L2, and, by Suffx Substitution Closure, this implies that aba ∈ L1 ∪ L2, which is not the case. Hence, L1 ∪ L2 is not SL2.

It's important to not misunderstand the weight of this result. It does not show that every union of two SL2 languages is not SL2-after all, the union of any SL2 language with itself must, necessarily, be SL2. It is easy to come up with pairs of distinct SL2 languages which yield an SL2 union as well,

1737_Class of local languages is not closed under union1.png

What it does say is that one can't count on the union of SL2 languages being SL2. This is in contrast to the closure result for intersection, which lets us build up languages out of simpler SL2 languages using intersection with con?dence that the result will be SL2. Showing that our desired language is the union of some simple SL2 languages doesn't help us. The result may or may not be SL.

Posted Date: 3/22/2013 12:53:40 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Class of local languages is not closed under union, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Class of local languages is not closed under union, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Class of local languages is not closed under union Discussions

Write discussion on Class of local languages is not closed under union
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
(c) Can you say that B is decidable? (d) If you somehow know that A is decidable, what can you say about B?

The SL 2 languages are speci?ed with a set of 2-factors in Σ 2 (plus some factors in {?}Σ and some factors in Σ{?} distinguishing symbols that may occur at the beginning and en

https://www.google.com/search?q=The+fomula+n%3D%28x%3D0%29%2F%281%3D2%29.The+value+x%3D0+and+is+used+to+stop+the+algerithin.The+calculation+is+reapeated+using+values+of+x%3D0+is+in

Normal forms are important because they give us a 'standard' way of rewriting and allow us to compare two apparently different grammars G1  and G2. The two grammars can be shown to

Theorem The class of ?nite languages is a proper subclass of SL. Note that the class of ?nite languages is closed under union and concatenation but SL is not closed under either. N

Let G be a graph with n > 2 vertices with (n2 - 3n + 4)/2 edges. Prove that G is connected.

build a TM that enumerate even set of even length string over a


We saw earlier that LT is not closed under concatenation. If we think in terms of the LT graphs, recognizing the concatenation of LT languages would seem to require knowing, while

State and Prove the Arden's theorem for Regular Expression