Cardinal payoffs, Game Theory

 

Cardinal payoffs are numbers representing the outcomes of a game where the numbers represent some continuum of values, such as money, market share or quantity. Cardinal payoffs permit the theorist to vary the intensity or degree of payoffs, unlike ordinal payoffs, in which only the order of values is pivotal. For mixed, payoffs, strategy calculations must be cardinal.

 

Posted Date: 7/21/2012 5:30:15 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Cardinal payoffs, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Cardinal payoffs, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Cardinal payoffs Discussions

Write discussion on Cardinal payoffs
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
How much time you want to spend on this material willdepend on the focus of your course. For many social sciencecourses, a general exposure to the ideas, based on a quick runthroug

What do you study about the saving, investment spending and financial system? Savings, Investment Spending, and the Financial System: 1. The correlation between savings and

The notion that those that don't contribute to some project might nevertheless get pleasure from it (free riders), evidenced in games like the tragedy of the commons and public pro

a) Define the term Nash equilibrium b) You are given the following pay-off matrix:   Strategies for player 1   Strategies for player 2

Description The simplest of William Poundstone's social dilemmas during which the every player contains a dominant strategy and also the equilibrium is Pareto optimal. the sole

A Nash equilibrium, named when John Nash, may be a set of methods, one for every player, such that no player has incentive to unilaterally amendment her action. Players are in equi

In a repeated game it is often unspecified that players move concurrently at predefined time intervals. However, if few players update their policies at different time intervals, t

Scenario The hawk-dove game is additionally commonly called the sport of chicken. 2 hooligans with one thing to prove drive at one another on a slender road. The primary to swer

Two people are involved in a dispute. Person 1 does not know whether person 2 is strong or weak; she assigns probability to person 2 being strong. Person 2 is fully informed. Each

Players 1 and 2 are bargaining over how to split one dollar. Both players simultaneously name shares they would like to keep s 1 and s 2 . Furthermore, players' choices have to be