Calculate quarterly performance metrics , Microeconomics

I would tend to think that a 5% per year goal is more reasonable. Smaller incremental goals always appear to be more attainable, while more radical goals may actually be more difficult or impossible to acheive. Although there are lessons to be learned from every failure, not being able to reach an overly aggressive goal may harm the image of a company or department, or possible harm employee morale.

Additionally, short term goals are more trackable. A projected year end goal may be broken down into quarterly performance metrics which give managers a snapshot of their firm's progress. Though not impossible, it is more difficult to break down and track the progress of a goal over a longer span of time.

I think that a "slow and steady" pace will add more value to the company over a long enough time line. As processes become streamlined, the same company can perhaps be shooting for even better numbers per year than previously attainable.

 

Posted Date: 3/25/2013 5:56:31 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Calculate quarterly performance metrics , Assignment Help, Ask Question on Calculate quarterly performance metrics , Get Answer, Expert's Help, Calculate quarterly performance metrics Discussions

Write discussion on Calculate quarterly performance metrics
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
1) A) Suppose that several months of data showed the CPI increasing at a 4.5% annual rate due largely to increases in the price of energy and food related commodities following sev

Ask qdescribe average and marginal revenue under imperfect competitionuestion

trend and structure of national income in nigeria

Surplus The surplus is a condition under that supply for a good or service is in excess of the demand for that good or service. When this happens, there is commonly a reduction


determinants of demand and determinants of supply




why does the quantity of salt tend to be unresponsive to changes in its price