How does this compare with other variances from standard
Course:- Accounting Basics
Reference No.:- EM13120022

Assignment Help
Expertsmind Rated 4.9 / 5 based on 47215 reviews.
Review Site
Assignment Help >> Accounting Basics

Of the several uses of standard costing, one of the most controversial is using these standards for performance evaluation of an individual, team, or unit. Consider the labor efficiency variance and assume it is one of the measures for a company's performance evaluation of a business unit. When might or might not variance from such a standard be an appropriate measure? How would this metric's effectiveness as a performance measure be affected by a decrease in demand or changes in production volume? Would its effectiveness be different for a service unit than a manufacturing unit? In the event that it is not effective as a performance measure, does it have a strong purpose? How does this compare with other variances from standard?

Put your comment

Ask Question & Get Answers from Experts
Browse some more (Accounting Basics) Materials
Henry transfers property with an adjusted basis of $95,000 and a FMV of $100,000 to a newly formed corporation in a Sec. 351 exchange. Henry receives stock with a FMV of $85
Discuss the E-Commerce payment systems. (Describe the features of traditional payment systems, explain the major e-commerce payment mechanisms, and describe the features and
What will this account be worth when you retire in 35 years? Now, assume that you wait 15 years before making the initial (and only) deposit to your retirement account. What w
AZ sells its utensils wholesale for $0.85 each; the average cost per unit is $0.83, of which $0.12 is fixed costs. If AZ were to accept BV's offer, what would be the increas
OPTIMAL CAPITAL BUDGET Marble Construction estimates that its WACC is 10% if equity comes from retained earnings. However, if the company issues new stock to raise new equit
Explain reverse-engineering of share prices in conceptual terms. How does reverse-engineering of share prices enable an analyst to infer (or deduce) the assumptions that the
Plant assets that cost $60,000 and were 80% depreciated were sold during 2010 for $8,000. The loss (not extraordinary) was incorrectly charged directly to Retained Earnings.
Atwater Manufacturing Company purchased a new machine especially built to perform one particular function on the assembly line. A difference of opinion has arisen as to the