What if one can''t wrap the local in an artificial block?, C/C++ Programming

Assignment Help:

What if one can''t wrap the local in an artificial block?


Related Discussions:- What if one can''t wrap the local in an artificial block?

B tree, real time application of b tree

real time application of b tree

Arrays, #question.Write a c++ program to accept and print a 1_d array

#question.Write a c++ program to accept and print a 1_d array

Explain public and private members, Public, Private and Protected members: ...

Public, Private and Protected members: Class members can either be declared in public','protected' or in the 'private' sections of the class. But as one of the features of OOP i

Time table, programme for time table in c++

programme for time table in c++

LOOPS, HOW CAN WE EASLY LEARN C++

HOW CAN WE EASLY LEARN C++

Do i require checking for null before delete p?, No. it's not required T...

No. it's not required The C++ language guarantees that delete p will do nothing if p is equivalent to NULL. As you might get the test backwards, and as most testing methodologie

Static optimality theorem, Question 1 Describe the following with respect ...

Question 1 Describe the following with respect to pointers in C language- Pointers and Arrays Usage of Pointers in functions Write programs in C to demonstrate the

Write a c program to add two complex numbers, #include stdio.h   struct  c...

#include stdio.h   struct  complex   {   float real;   float imag;   };   struct complex complexadd(struct complex,struct  complex);   void main()     {          Date: 26

Memory management operator, Memory Management Operator In C malloc( ), ...

Memory Management Operator In C malloc( ), calloc( ), realloc( ), and free( ) are used to mange dynamic memory.  In addition to these function C++ have derived two unary ope

3/15/2013 5:35:15 AM

What if one can''t wrap the local in an artificial block?

A: Mostly time, one can limit the lifetime of a local via wrapping the local in an artificial block ({...}). But if for some cause you can''t do that, add a member function which has a similar effect as the destructor. Although do not call the destructor itself!

For instance, in the case of class File, you may add a close() method. The destructor typically will simply call this close() method. Note down that the close() method will have to mark the File object so a subsequent call won''t re-close an already-closed File. For example it might set the fileHandle_ data member to some nonsensical value like -1, and it may check at the starting to see if the fileHandle_ is already equal to -1:

 

class File {

public:

void close();

~File();

... private:

int fileHandle_; // fileHandle_ >= 0 if/only-if it''s open

};

File::~File()

{

close();

}

void File::close()

{

if (fileHandle_ >= 0) {

...insert code to call the OS to close the file... fileHandle_ = -1;

}

}

Note down that the other File methods might also have to check if the fileHandle_ is -1 (that mean., check if the File is closed).

Note down  also that any constructors that don''t actually open a file should set fileHandle_ to -1.

 

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd