Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Legal rights - Winding up:
In substance these two people are really partners" and by analogy with the law of partnership (which permits dissolution if the partners are really unable to work together) it was just and equitable to order liquidation.
(a) The members or directors are associated in the company on the basis of certain understandings but one (or more) exercises his legal rights against another in breach of those understandings with results which are unfair. Such situations are sometimes referred to as a "fraud on the minority"
Case: EBRAHIM v. WESTBOURNE GALLERIES (1973)
E and N carried on business together for 25 years, originally as partners and for the last 10 years through a company in which each originally had 500 shares. E and N were the first directors and shared the profits as directors' remuneration; no dividends were paid. When N's son joined the business he became a third director and E and N each transferred 100 shares to N's son. Eventually there were disputes: N and his son used their voting control in general meeting (600 votes against 400) to remove E from his directorship under the power of removal given by Companies Act 1948 s.184 (Kenya, s.185). E sued to have the company wound up.
Held:
The company should be wound up. N and his son were within their legal rights in removing E from his directorship but the past relationship made it "unjust or inequitable" to insist on legal rights and the court could intervene on equitable principles to order liquidation. E's petition for relief on grounds of oppression of minority failed since he failed to make out a strong enough case for such relief.
Question 1: Explain the main elements that constitute a valid contract. Question 2: Explain the concepts of negligence and remoteness of damage in tort law. Questio
Remedies of the Buyer - Sales of Goods (a)Damages for non-delivery Section number 51 (1) provides that whether the seller wrongfully neglects or refuses to deliver the go
Question 1: (a) In the Mauritian Legal System, there is a hierarchy of courts. Describe the various courts. (b) State and critically examine the features of the 5 main sour
Article 33 - Pacific settlement of disputes Article 33 the meaning of Negotiation is the same as in domestic law. It is a preferred mode and third party intervention is not nee
Effects or Consequences of Illegality Misdemeanour Or Illegality renders a contract unenforceable. However the contract creates no rights and imposes no obligations at the pa
What are types of segments required for decision? A judge’s decision is made up of two segments, which are given below: a. Obiter dicta: Things said through the way on
Appointment of Directors: In the absence of other provisions in a company's articles, the directors of the company would be appointed in accordance with the following provisio
Express and Implied terms of contract Express terms However the terms of a contract are said to like "express terms" whether the parties themselves adverted to them on
Proceedings for Compulsory Liquidation: When the petition is presented to the court a copy is delivered to the company in case it objects, and it is advertised so that other
Q. Statutory task force on phoenix activity? A long term option could be the establishment of a statutory task force on phoenix activity. This could be supported by all the rel
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd