Generalization of the interpretation of local automata, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

The generalization of the interpretation of strictly local automata as generators is similar, in some respects, to the generalization of Myhill graphs. Again, the set of possible symbols that may appear at any given point depends only on the previous k - 1 symbols. Here this is realized by taking the factors to be tiles and allowing a tile labeled σ2, . . . , σk, σk+1 to be placed over the last k-1 symbols of a tile labeled σ1, σ2, . . . , σk. Again, the process starts with a tile labeled 'x  ' and ends when a tile labeled '  x' is placed. Strings of length less than k - 1 are generated with a single tile.

Note that there is a sense in which this mechanism is the dual of the k-local Myhill graphs. In the graphs, the vertices are labeled with the pre?x of the factors in the automaton and the edges are labeled with the last symbol of the label of the node the edge is incident to. It is those edge labels that call out the string being recognized and the initial k - 1 positions of the string label the edges incident from ‘x'. Here it is the exposed symbols that call out the string being generated and these are the initial symbols of the tiles. And the ?nal k -1 symbols of the string are the symbols labeling the last tile, the one labeled with ‘x'.


Related Discussions:- Generalization of the interpretation of local automata

Class of local languages is not closed under union, Both L 1 and L 2 are ...

Both L 1 and L 2 are SL 2 . (You should verify this by thinking about what the automata look like.) We claim that L 1 ∪ L 2 ∈ SL 2 . To see this, suppose, by way of con

Non deterministic finite state automaton, Automaton (NFA) (with ε-transitio...

Automaton (NFA) (with ε-transitions) is a 5-tuple: (Q,Σ, δ, q 0 , F i where Q, Σ, q 0 and F are as in a DFA and T ⊆ Q × Q × (Σ ∪ {ε}). We must also modify the de?nitions of th

Suffix substitution closure, Our primary concern is to obtain a clear chara...

Our primary concern is to obtain a clear characterization of which languages are recognizable by strictly local automata and which aren't. The view of SL2 automata as generators le

Applying the pumping lemma, Applying the pumping lemma is not fundamentally...

Applying the pumping lemma is not fundamentally di?erent than applying (general) su?x substitution closure or the non-counting property. The pumping lemma is a little more complica

Finite languages and strictly local languages, Theorem The class of ?nite l...

Theorem The class of ?nite languages is a proper subclass of SL. Note that the class of ?nite languages is closed under union and concatenation but SL is not closed under either. N

Decidability, examples of decidable problems

examples of decidable problems

Differentiate between dfa and nfa, Differentiate between DFA and NFA. Conve...

Differentiate between DFA and NFA. Convert the following Regular Expression into DFA. (0+1)*(01*+10*)*(0+1)*. Also write a regular grammar for this DFA.

Turing machine, Can v find the given number is palindrome or not using turi...

Can v find the given number is palindrome or not using turing machine

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd