Full equilibrium strategy example, Game Theory

Assignment Help:

 (a) A player wins if she takes the total to 100 and additions of any value from 1 through 10 are allowed. Thus, if you take the sum to 89, you are guaran- teed to win; your opponent must take the sum to at least 90 but can take it no higher than 99. In either case you can get to 100 on the next move. Using rollback, you can show that you can win if you can get the sum to 78 or to 67 . . . or to 12 or to 1. Thus, being the first mover and using a strategy that entails choosing 1 on the first move and then saying 11 minus whatever your opponent says allows you to win; you take the sum successively to 12, 23, . . ., 78, 89, and 100.

Technically, the full equilibrium strategy is

(i) if you are the first player, start with 1;

(ii) if the current total is not (100 – 11n) for some n, then choose the number that will bring the total to this form; or

(iii) if the current total is of the form (100 – 11n), then choose any number (all choices are equally bad).


(b) In this version, you lose if you force the total to equal or exceed 100, so you can win if you take the total to 99. Using the same type of analysis as  above, you see that you can win if you can get the sum to 88, 77, . . ., 22, or 11. This time you want to be the second mover. Your strategy should be to say 11 minus whatever your opponent says; this strategy takes you successively to 11, 22, . . ., 77,88, 99, and a win.

The full equilibrium strategy is

(i) if you are the first player, choose any number (all choices are equally bad);

(ii) if the current total is a multiple of 11, choose any number (all choices are equally bad); or

(iii) if the current total is not a multiple of 11, choose the number that will make the total a multiple of 11 (this is equivalent to choosing 11 minus the number just chosen by your opponent).


Related Discussions:- Full equilibrium strategy example

Bid rigging, A practice analogous to price fixing in which auction members ...

A practice analogous to price fixing in which auction members form a ring whose associates agree not to bid against each other, either by discarding the auction or by placing phony

Consolidation, For the section on dynamic games of competition, you can beg...

For the section on dynamic games of competition, you can begin by asking if anyone in the class has played competi- tive tennis (club or collegiate or better); there is usually one

Game tree, A game tree (also referred to as the in depth form) may be a gra...

A game tree (also referred to as the in depth form) may be a graphical illustration of a sequential game. It provides data concerning the players, payoffs, strategies, and also the

What are the important forms of product differentiation, What are the impor...

What are the important forms of product differentiation? There are three significant forms of product differentiation, which are: 1. Differentiation through style or type –

Find all nash equilibria of game- game theory, Game Theory: (prisoner'...

Game Theory: (prisoner's dilemma) Consider the following 2 x 2 pricing game, where rms choose whether to price High or Low simultaneously. Find the equilibrium in dominant s

Find the perfect sub game nash equilibrium, Suppose that the incumbent mono...

Suppose that the incumbent monopolist, in the previous question, can decide (before anything else happens) to make an irreversible investment in extra Capacity (C), or Not (N). If

Game 3 bargaining, GAME 3 Bargaining Two players A and B are chosen. P...

GAME 3 Bargaining Two players A and B are chosen. Player A offers a split of a dollar (whole dimes only). If B agrees, both get paid the agreed coins and the game is over. If

Mutual information, Something in a very game is Mutual information if all p...

Something in a very game is Mutual information if all players realize it. A seemingly straightforward concept, mutual information is insufficient to research most games, since it's

Two player problem of points set up - game theory, a) Show that A c...

a) Show that A counting proof could be fun(?). But any old proof will do. (Note that the coefficients (1,2,1) in the above are just the elements of the second row of Pas

Bayes, Eighteenth century British mathematician who recognized a method for...

Eighteenth century British mathematician who recognized a method for probabilistic mathematical inference. His Bayes Theorem, published posthumously, treats probability as a logic.

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd