Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes, Operation Management

Assignment Help:

Fraction Defective P Chart - Control Charts for Attributes

This type of chart is used when it is impractical or inconvenient to maintain a constant sample size. Instead of plotting the number of defectives in each sample, the proportion (p) or fraction of defectives is calculated and then plotted. Clearly, to ensure that meaningful plots are made, the sample sizes must be large enough to ensure that a number of defectives will typically be found. This may seem to imply that some level of non-conformance is being accepted, but this is not necessarily so. For example, consider the Go/Not-go gauging example shown in the figure on page 249. Whilst the design limits of size on the component diameter might be, say, 24.98 mm and 25.02 mm; for process control purposes the gaps in the gauge might be set at, say, 24.99 and 25.01 respectively. Remembering that, for attributes, only two states are possible (defective/non defective) the relevant probability distribution is the binomial distribution, the mean of which (¯p) can be estimated by inspecting a large number of items:

¯p = total number of defectives/ total number inspected

An estimate of the standard deviation of the binomial distribution (σp), for samples of size n is given by:

σp = √(¯p (1-¯p) / n)

For small values of n the profiles of the binomial distributions are distinctly skewed, but, for large values of n and, particularly, when the product p n is greater than about 5, the distributions are sufficiently symmetrical to be well-approximated by the normal distribution. In this latter situation the control chart limits can be determined in the same manner as for variables charts.

2206_Fraction Defective P Chart - Control Charts for Attributes.png

It will be realised that the implied constant sample size (n) in these expressions presents some difficulty in a procedure when the sample size is allowed to vary. This can be surmounted by using an average value for n, and limiting variation in the size of subsequent samples to, say, ±20 per cent of this value: the results will still be sufficiently accurate for most process control purposes.


Related Discussions:- Fraction defective p chart - control charts for attributes

Explain tuxedo ordering system for a local school system, You are on a proj...

You are on a project team that has been assigned a tuxedo ordering system for a local school system your question here

Explain optimum service level is what percent, In a single period model if ...

In a single period model if shortage cost is four times excess cost then the optimum service level is what percent?

Compute expected value for the add assembly line option, Howard Weiss, Inc....

Howard Weiss, Inc., is considering building a sensitive new airport scanning device.His managers believe that there is a probability of 0.40 that the ATR Co. will come out with a c

Explain cause are linked to employee disciplinary actions, Identify how the...

Identify how the issues of due process and just cause are linked to employee disciplinary actions

Explain hr provides managers with data to make decisions, Evidence-based HR...

Evidence-based HR provides managers with data to make decisions, instead of just relying on intuition. True False

Explain lower control limits for mean and range charts, Determine upper and...

Determine upper and lower control limits for mean and range charts.

Define importance of training and education, Define importance of Training ...

Define importance of Training and Education. Importance of Training and Education: Training and education bring employees to a standard whether they can carry out industrial

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd