Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
The case company combines SKUs into product groups and product groups into assortment groups. The methods based on advance demand information (Methods 1-3) can therefore be on a product group level, on an assortment level, or for all assortment groups together. We tested all three ways for all three methods, and for each method it turned out that forecasting on a product group level provided the best results (and for all SKUs together the worst). Therefore, we will only report the results on a product group level.
We remark that the ongoing policy of the company was actually to produce forecasts based on advance demand information, but on an assortment group level. Their method used a combination of the rules for dividing group demand (i.e. for calculating fn; n 2N)of Methods 1 and 2. It applied a different way of estimating group demand M. Instead of using (1), a planning committee consisting of mainly purchasers had to reach a consensus, also taking budget restrictions into account. Since the resulting forecasts have not been recorded, they cannot be compared to those of other methods in our empirical investigation. We do remark that letting budget restrictions play a role in forecasting obviously carries the risk of underestimations to stay within budget or over-estimations to avoid losing part of the budget (in future years).
Since having a top, mid and flop class is intuitively most appealing, only results for three categories are presented. We also tested the top-flop method with varying class sizes. However, again, this did not (signi?cantly) improve the performance. Therefore, we report results for equal-sized classes only. We note that contrary to ABC inventory classi?cation, where class A SKUs typically get special attention and their number therefore needs to be limited, class sizes do not affect the complexity of applying the top-flop method.
Problem: (a) The Mauritius Automated Clearing and Settlement System (MACSS) is the Mauritian Real-time Gross Settlement (RTGS) system. (i) Outline briefly the concept of R
Here is the pro-forma income statement for Semen Indonesia, an overseas venture that Cemex is planning to invest in. In this exercise, you will need to evaluate the inve
Ask questThe credit term "2/45 net 90" indicatesion #Minimum 100 words accepted#
differentiate between allocative efficiency and pricing efficiency.
Finance There are various ways of making a payment for M&A. Cash, stock-swap and combination of both. The hybrid paying method is commonly used method for most of organisations
Theoretically Modigliani and Miller (1958) took a fairly straightforward view of the purpose of a company in an economy. They pointed out that companies take cash from providers o
Corporation Hallmark, located in California, was in the business of manufacturing custom-ordered greeting cards, boxes, wrapping paper, and other paper products. Its operation is v
Question 1: Capital Expenditure Decisions and Investment Criteria (30 MARKS) In recent years Morten Ltd, a company that manufactures and markets a range of p
1. A contributes property to X, a newly formed corporation, in exchange for 75 shares. As part of the same transaction, B contributes services to X in exchange for the remaining 2
From Finance.yahoo.com Part 1: Show the P/E ratio for each company (as reported in finance.yahoo.com). Answer the question: Which of these two firms seems to be more of a "growth
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd