Differences between registered companies and partnerships, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:

Differences between registered companies and partnerships:

The basic differences between registered companies and partnerships are as follows:

(a) Formation

Registration is the legal pre-requisite for the formation of a registered company: Fort Hall Bakery Supply Co v Wangoe (1).

The Partnership Act does not prescribe registration   as a condition precedent to partnership formation.   A partnership may therefore be formed informally or,   if the partners deem it prudent, in writing under   a Partnership Deed or Articles.         

(b) Legal Status

A registered company enjoys the legal status of a body corporate which is conferred on it by the Companies Act.

A partnership is not a body corporate and is non-existent in the contemplation of the law. Such  business as appears to be carried on by it is in fact carried on by the individual partners.

(c) Number of Members

A registered private company must have at least two members under s.4 of the Companies Act and a maximum  of fifty members (excluding current and former  employees of the company who are also its members),  under s.30 of the Act. A public registered company must have at least seven members under s.4 of the Companies Act but without a prescribed upper limit. A partnership cannot consist of more than 20 partners.

(d) Transfer of Shares

Shares in a registered company are freely transferable unless the company's articles  incorporate restrictive provisions.

A partnership has no shares as such but a partner cannot transfer his interest in the firm to a third party unless all the partners have agreed to the   proposed transfer.                  

(e) Management

A company's members have no right to participate in the company's day to day management. Such  management is vested in the board of directors.

Partners have the right to participate in the firm's   day to day management since s.3 of the Partnership Act requires the business to be carried on "in  common". The right of participation in the firm's management is however not given to a partner who has limited his liability for the firm's debts.

 (f) Agency

A member is not, per se, an agent of the company: Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd (3). A partner is an  agent of the firm because the business is carried on "in common" by the partners themselves. The  Partnership Act, s.7 also expressly provides that every partner is an agent of the firm and his other partners for the purpose of the business of the  partnership.

(g) Liability of Members

A company's member is not personally liable for the company's debts because, legally, they are not his debts.

A partner is personally liable for the firm's debts. This rule has been codified by s.11 of the Partnership Act which provides that "every partner in a  firm is liable jointly with the other partners for all debts and obligations of the firm incurred while he is a partner", unless the partner is a limited partner.


Related Discussions:- Differences between registered companies and partnerships

Legal justification - constructive notice, Legal justification - Constructi...

Legal justification - Constructive notice: The legal justification for this rule is that since the company's public documents in its file at the Companies Registry are availab

Criminal-justice system, Models for a criminal-justice system based on an e...

Models for a criminal-justice system based on an ethos of rehabilitation and reintegration ... have been regarded as idealistic but unworkable in the real world, except perhaps in

What is meant by ratio decidendi, Question: (a) Explian the various sta...

Question: (a) Explian the various stages that a Bill must go through before it becomes enforceable as a Law in Mauritius. (c) Mr. Vijay is the tenant of a house situated at

Express and implied terms of contract, Express and Implied terms of contrac...

Express and Implied terms of contract Express terms However the terms of a contract are said to like "express terms" whether the parties themselves adverted to them on

When is an employer not vicariously liable, When is an employer not vicario...

When is an employer not vicariously liable? An employer is not vicariously liable when: a. Worker is doing something in working hours as of a personal nature. b. She or h

Global competitiveness of firms, Question 1 Briefly explain: (i) Des...

Question 1 Briefly explain: (i) Describe Business ethics. (ii) Illustrate caveat emptor. (iii) Define corporate governance. (iv) What is whistle blowing? (v) D

Proceedings at meetings - meetings and resolutions, Proceedings at Meetings...

Proceedings at Meetings: (a)Each item of business comprised in the notice should be taken separately, discussed and put to the vote.  Members may propose ammendments to the re

#title.CONTRACT., WHAT ARE MITIGATING FACTORS OF A CONTRACT

WHAT ARE MITIGATING FACTORS OF A CONTRACT

Consideration - element of contract, Consideration - Element of Contract ...

Consideration - Element of Contract Just to an agreement to constitute a contract the common law of the England then adopted in the US, requires such, must be supported with c

Negotiable instruments - law of contract, Negotiable Instruments - Law of C...

Negotiable Instruments - Law of Contract However past services may constitute valuable consideration to a bill of exchange under by s.27 of the Bills of Exchange Act that prov

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd