Consideration must move from the promise - law of contract, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:

Consideration must move from the promise - Law of Contract

Conversely the rule that "consideration must move from the promisee" means such only a person who has personally given consideration to a promise can sue for breach to the promise.  Well a person who has not given consideration about a promise cannot sue the promisor with the simple reason such he cannot expect to get something for nothing. Hence the common law regards a contract like a bargain between the parties to a commercial transaction thus each of whom has bought the promise to the other with his own promise or like act. 

Actually this is illustrated through the case of Dunlop v Selfridge in whereas the appellants were motor tyre manufacturers and sold tyres to Messrs Dew & Co. That who were motor accessory dealers.  Hence under the terms of the contract Dew & Co. agreed not to sell the tyres below the Dunlop's list prices, and as the Dunlop's agents, to obtain from other retailers a related undertaking.  Well in return for this undertaking Dew & Co. were to obtain discounts, some of that they could pass on to retailers who bought tyres.  But Selfridge & Co. accepted two orders from customers to Dunlop covers at a lower price.  Whether they obtained the covers through Dew & Co. and signed an agreement just not to sell or offer the tyres below list price. 

Further it was further agreed that by £5 per tyre so sold should be paid to Dunlop through way of liquidated damages.  Through Selfridge's supplied one of the two tyres ordered below list price.  Though they did not actually supply the other, although informed the customer such they could only supply it at list price.  Well the appellants claimed an injunction and damages against the respondents to breach of the agreement completed with Dew & Co., claiming such Dew & Co. were their agents in the matter. Actually it was held that there was no contract made between the parties.  Thus Dunlop could not enforce the contract made between the respondents and Dew & Co. since they had not supplied the consideration.  Smooth if Dunlop were undisclosed principals, such there was no consideration moving between them and the respondents.  Moreover The discount received through Selfridge was part of that given through Dunlop to Dew & Co. since Dew & Co. were not bound to confer any part of their discount for retailers the discount received through Selfridge operated only like consideration between themselves and Dew & Co. and could not be claimed through Dunlop as consideration to support a promise not for sell below list price.


Related Discussions:- Consideration must move from the promise - law of contract

Powers, Powers: The ultra vires doctrine limits a company's powers to ...

Powers: The ultra vires doctrine limits a company's powers to the attainment of the company's objects under its  memorandum of association. Partnerships are not  affected by t

Provisional contracts - law of contract, Provisional Contracts - Law of Con...

Provisional Contracts - Law of Contract However occasionally an agreement may be illustrated through the parties thereto as being as "a provisional agreement" until a legally

Purpose of the rule - statutory provisions, Purpose of the rule: It ha...

Purpose of the rule: It has been stated by various English judges that without the rule in Foss v Harbottle (i)            There would be futile actions.  A court order

Liability of members, Liability Of Members: S.72 (1) provides that in ...

Liability Of Members: S.72 (1) provides that in the case of a reduction of share capital a member of the company so there past or present and shall not be liable in respect of

Increasing the risk rating of building and construction, Q. Increasing the ...

Q. Increasing the risk rating of building and construction? Stakeholders indicated that there is a significant risk of phoenix activity in the building and construction industr

Commercial Law, Silcraze City Council owns and operates a Gym. It charges $...

Silcraze City Council owns and operates a Gym. It charges $20 per month as membership fees. On the Gym Membership Card it is written that the Cardholder has the right to use all th

Terminate the contract of employment, QUESTION 1 In the exercise of its...

QUESTION 1 In the exercise of its disciplinary power an employer can terminate an employee's contract. Should an employer decide not to terminate the contract of employment, wh

Advantages of alternative dispute resolution, Question 1: (a) Elaborat...

Question 1: (a) Elaborate on the sources of Law in Mauritius. (b) Explain what you understand by the following legal terms: (i) Obiter Dictum

Revival of a dissolved company, Revival of a Dissolved Company: Liquid...

Revival of a Dissolved Company: Liquidation leads on to dissolution of the company.  The court may, however, within the ensuing two years order that dissolution be rescinded a

What is the meaning of conciliation, (a) Section 63 of the Employment Rela...

(a) Section 63 of the Employment Relations Act provides as follows: "The parties to a labour dispute may jointly refer such dispute for voluntary arbitration to the Tribunal or

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd