Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
The Concept of Efficiency is stated below:
To illustrate this concept of the efficiency, it is used to expand the understanding of what is meant by the Pareto-efficient allocation of economic resources. This is the situation in which it is not probable to move to other allocation which would make some people improved off and nobody worse off. In this context of the production possibilities frontier, then, points on the frontier are all Pareto-efficient, as it is not possible to move to the one more point (which means produce more of one good) without incurring some opportunity price (which means sacrificing the production of some other good).
Economists argue that the free-market perfect competitively for economy where P=MC automatically delivers most favourable allocation in the economy (Pareto-efficiency), so every government intervention (such as tax) which interferes with that the allocation generates efficiency losses. The efficiency (or the welfare) loss of the tax can be illustrated by an easy demand supply diagram. It can be seen that the loss in consumer and the producer surplus is much more than the revenue gain to government.
Does the above argument state that a tax can never be justified on the grounds of efficiency?
The answer to the question asked to us is No. There are major two cases in which imposing the tax might actually be better than not imposing it.
i. When there are market failures and the tax is imposed to bring the marginal social cost equal to the marginal social benefit.
ii. When there are existing distortions in economy and taxes are imposed to the spread distortion over various commodities rather than placing burden on just one commodity. An additional way to say the same thing is that: it is better to impose a little tax on a number of commodities to increase a certain amount of the government revenue, in spite impose one large tax on one or two commodities specifically.
formula of range
EM13250 solution needed
Human numbers grew as the population after 1800 After 1800, human numbers grew as the population explosion took hold. It carried our entire population to 6 billion in October 1
Ask qdescribe average and marginal revenue under imperfect competitionuestion
What is an optimization in the methods of mathematics of modern economics? Optimization is a basic tool for the development of modern microeconomics analysis. Many of economic
Which of the following is a free good? Fresh water, forests in the northwestern United States, the advice of economists, or none of the above?
Differentiate between firm and industry. A firm is a business unit produced for the purpose of carrying out some kind of trading activity. The term "firm" is used in many ways
info about Inorganic chemistry
Is there a trade-off between inflation and unemployment? The Keynesian side posits that policies can indeed be used to stimulate demand - demand-side policies - and those mar
What is the distinguishing characteristic of institutions in the public purpose sphere? The distinguishing characteristic of institutions in the public purpose sphere is that t
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +1-415-670-9521
Phone: +1-415-670-9521
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd