Functionality All functions are properly covered Most functions are properly covered Some functions are missing or not properly covered OK, with some obvious shortcomings. Poor, not acceptable Forms All forms are present and well designed Most forms are present and well designed Some forms are missing or not properly designed OK, with some obvious shortcomings. Poor, not acceptable General navigation and appearance Excellent, outstanding effort made Very good effort Good effort made but not outstanding Acceptable Poor, not acceptable

Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Splash page Project opens properly Project opens properly, but not enough effort Generally OK, with some deficiencies. OK, with some obvious shortcomings. Poor, not acceptable Data structure All tables and attributes have been included Most tables and attributes have been included Some deficiencies in the tables and attributes OK, with some obvious shortcomings. Poor, not acceptable

Assumptions and constraints Very well defined Most of the areas defined Some areas defined OK, with some obvious shortcomings. Poor, not acceptable Appendices References Excellent use of sources. Accurate referencing. Obvious that outstanding effort made Very good effort Good effort made but not outstanding Acceptable Poor, not acceptable Presentation Excellent, outstanding effort made Very good effort Good effort made but not outstanding Made some effort, but only acceptable Poor, not acceptable

Specific requirements Requirements are all covered and properly specified Most requirements are covered and properly specified Some requirements are missing or not properly specified OK, with some obvious shortcomings. Poor, not acceptable Analysis models All elements and diagrams are present and well designed Most elements and diagrams are present and well designed Some components are missing or not properly designed OK, with some obvious shortcomings. Poor, not acceptable

Marking Rubric for SRS document: Total Marks 50 Grade/Mark HD 80% -100% D 70%-79% C 60%-69% P 50%-59% Fail <50 Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Introduction Project properly summarized and set in context Generally easy to follow, with some deficiencies. Summary not easy to follow, context unclear Some relevance and briefly presented. This is not relevant to the assignment Scope, objectives and goals All topics are pertinent and covered in depth. Most topics are pertinent and covered in depth Correct, with some deficiencies OK, with some obvious shortcomings. Poor, not acceptable

SRS Description of the section Marks Introduction In this subsection, describe the purpose of the particular SRS and specify the intended audience for the SRS 5 Scope, objectives and goals • Explain the software product(s) to be produced • Explain what the software product(s) will, and will not do • Describe the relevant benefits, objectives, and goals of the project 12 Specific requirements Functional and non-functional requirements 10 Analysis models Context Diagram, Use Case Diagram, Entity Relationship Diagram 12 assumptions, constraints assumptions, and constraints 5 Appendices, references IEEE style 3 Presentation Appearance, grammar, clarity etc. 3 Total 50

All team members are expected to contribute equally and are awarded the same group marks. However, a group member might be marked individually if there is an evidence based on the reporting by other group members of a minimum contribution or participation by a team member. Marker’s comments below along with the marks will explain if you have been marked individually.

Submission Guidelines • All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page. • The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. • Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style.