Reference no: EM132114870

Equal Employment Opportunity

 Diversity is present in today's workplace. To protect the rights of employees today, we have several equal employment laws. This is notonly in the United States, but also around the world. For this assignment:

Present a situation that you, or someone you are familiar with, has faced related to diversity in the workplace.

Identify a federal law that protects the employee in that situation.

Determine how the organization should behave and how it can defend its actions in this situation.

Identify an international law that may protect that employee if the situation happens in that other country.

Determine how the organization should behave and how it can defend its actions in this situation.

Explain the similarities and differences between both laws.

Parameters

Submit a Word document to the digital drop box

The paper should be 1-3 pages long

Use 1" margins (all around) and double space

Use Times New Roman or Arial font, size 12

Use APA format

Answer the following questions:

What are the key characteristics of the social model?

Explain the differences between validity and reliability?

In what ways might you write or develop objectives to minimize under inclusion or overinclusion?

What is the difference between process and effect objectives?

For effect objectives at each level of the pyramid, what sources of data might be commonly used for establishing targets?

Case Study: The Model College Counseling Center

A SWOT analysis is a very effective way of identifying strengths and weaknesses of examining the opportunities and threats faced by an organization. Carrying out an analysis using the SWOT framework helps an organization to focus its activities into areas where it is strongest and where the greatest opportunities lie.

Read - "The Model College Counseling Center" in Management of Human Service Programs (pg. 75)

Perform a SWOT analysis for the counseling center of Hillsboro University and answer the following questions

What are the real issues at stake?

If you were to be involved in a planning process like the one suggested by the university vice president, what steps would you follow?

Who would be involved in the planning process?

Is there any way that earlier planning procedures might have prevented the conflict described in this case?