Who funded the development of the guideline

Assignment Help Other Subject

Reference no: EM133208028 , Length: Word Count: 3 Pages

Assignment - Nursing Evidence Based Practice Critique Paper

Critique - Critical Appraisal of a Clinical Practice Guideline

Locate an evidence-based practice guideline of your choice that is relevant to the practice of an APRN.

Page limit: 3, narrative APA format

Refer to the Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklist for Evidence-based Guidelines within Appendix B on page 722 of the text: Melnyk, B. M. & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare: A guide to best practice (4rd Ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer.

Introduction

Include the citation for the guideline and where it was found

Provide rationale for why you chose this guideline; include why this should be used in practice.

Credibility

Who developed the guideline?

Were the developers representative of the key stakeholders in this specialty? Was the guideline developed by an interdisciplinary team?

Who funded the development of the guideline?

Were any of the guidelines developers funded researchers of the reviewed studies?

Was there a valid development strategy?

Was it explicit how decisions were made; did the process used to identify, select, and combine evidence appear sensible and impartial?

Was there a comprehensive, reproducible literature review within the past 12 months of its publication/revision?

Were all of the important outcomes and options considered?

Is each recommendation included in the guide labeled by the level/strength of evidence and linked with scientific evidence?

Does the guideline make explicit recommendations?

Has the guideline gone through peer review and testing?

Applicability/Generalizability

Is the intent of use provided?

Are the recommendations clinically relevant?

Will the recommendations help an APRN in caring for patients? Why or why not? How will an APRN use this guideline in practice?

Are the recommendations practical, feasible?

Are the recommendations a major variation from current practice?

Can the outcomes be measured through standard care?

Summary

Summarize the major discoveries of the critique.

Reference no: EM133208028

Questions Cloud

How key biostatistical calculations and methods support : IHP 525 Southern New Hampshire University. Explain how key biostatistical calculations and methods support the conclusions in each article.

How has the service demonstrated respect for all languages : An education and care service spent some time hosting children from Japan. The Japanese children shared with the other children, many different customs and trad

Building and operating the world-leading accelerator : Building and operating the world-leading accelerator and detector facilities and performing pioneering research with national and global partners

Discuss process for mining and extracting that mineral : You will choose a mineral, this can be one from your original 10, or you can select a new mineral. For this mineral, you will discuss the process for mining

Who funded the development of the guideline : Who funded the development of the guideline? Were any of the guidelines developers funded researchers of the reviewed studies

Identify a problem in current place of employment : Utilizing the concepts and theories discussed in the course identify a problem in your current place of employment.

How you determine inhibitors effect on epinephrines actions : You've discovered a new drug that inhibits G-protein receptor kinases. How would you determine this inhibitor's effect on epinephrine's actions?

Philosophical approach to humanitarian action : b) The idea that utilitarianism is a more relevant philosophical approach to humanitarian action than consequentialism

Determine if there are any flaws in variable choices : Present statistical results. Consider whether the study was done ethically and whether the presentation of results is appropriate.

User Account

All Pages