Reference no: EM131295016
Write an essay on reflection about what you learned about federal government and leadership in the course.
A minimum of two full double-spaced pages (many of you will write more and that's fine!) word processed (no handwritten copies will be accepted), 12-point font Times New Roman, Arial or Calibri only, 1" margins and stapled in the upper left-hand corner. Unstapled papers will be penalized 5 points. Use the standard MLA heading; you don't need a cover page.
Your take-home essay is to be a reflection about what you learned about federal government and leadership in the course. The first paragraph or introduction should tell how you felt about going into the course. Were you excited about studying federal government, or was it just a requirement? What did you hope to learn? How did you feel about the course when Dr. McConachie said it was a Leadership Development Course?
The first part of the body of the paper should describe in seven short paragraphs with two or three complete sentences, seven things you now know about federal government that you didn't know prior to taking this class. Try to draw from throughout the semester. Tell what it is you learned, what you learned and why you chose it. Do not use a bullet list or you will be penalized.
After these seven paragraphs, write a longer paragraph or two about how this course impacted your view of leadership. Did you learn anything about leadership? If so, what? Do you feel you gained anything as a leader? Why or why not? Now, please feel free to be honest. If you think the leadership component of this course was a waste of time, say so; but be able to defend it with specific examples or evidence. By the same token, if you think the leadership component really helped the course, do the same.
Finally conclude your paper (one paragraph) by evaluating whether combining federal government and leadership is a good idea. If so, what changes would you make? If not, why not?
|
Common judgment traps include
: The SEC's position on independence can best be characterized as: Common judgment traps include: A conflict of interest exists when:
|
|
Critically analyze this issue facing the company
: Briefly describe one of the major strategic issues that Starbucks currently faces - Describe what the company has done to address the issue and describe the leadership's role in this issue.
|
|
Discuss the role of the department of homeland security
: Discuss the role of the Department of Homeland Security and associated sub-agencies in the war on terrorism. Do you think, the creation of DHS has helped, hurt, or has not been a factor in domestic counterterrorism efforts?
|
|
Accounts receivable without recourse
: Mission Company factors $40,000 of accounts receivable without recourse. The factor agrees to provide financing based on these receivables, but imposes a 10% fee. In addition, the transferor and transferee agree that there will probably be $3,000 of ..
|
|
What you learned about federal government and leadership
: Write an essay on reflection about what you learned about federal government and leadership in the course. How did you feel about the course when Dr. McConachie said it was a Leadership Development Course?
|
|
Eliminating alternative accounting treatments
: In essay form, answer: If uniformity means eliminating alternative accounting treatments, then surely comparability of financial statements of different enterprises is improved. Do you agree with this statement?
|
|
Prepare general journal entries to enter the transactions
: Some of the transactions of Torres Company during August are listed below. Torres uses the periodic inventory method. Prepare general journal entries to enter the transactions. Prepare the adjusting entry necessary on August 31 if financial statement..
|
|
What were the consequences and the outcome of the case
: Explain the particulars of the corruption case you have chosen (place, date, a concise overview of case/example). How was the case of corruption revealed, and what were the consequences and the outcome of the case?
|
|
The house subcommittee on oversight and investigations
: Diane is a CFO at We Do What We Want, Inc. She was just instructed by her boss, the CEO, to accelerate the recording of revenue into an earlier year to meet financial analysts' earnings projections. The House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigati..
|