Reference no: EM133973826

Question: Demonstrate alignment to the Florida Educational Leadership Standards; however, much of the writing relies on generalized academic language and summary-level descriptions of leadership practices as previously noted in my comments. I will allow you to revise under the following parameters. I want you to move beyond describing initiatives to reflecting on your role, thinking, and leadership learning.

The best way to do this is to ensure that you anchor your writing in a lived experience./ To do this, describe your role or relation to each of the initiatives. For 3 of the initiatives, include a specific leadership action you observed or participated in, a decision that had to be made, a challenge or tension that emerged and how leadership responded and ultimately what you learned from it. Avoid language that could apply to any school. Your examples should reflect your school, your context, and your experience. It is important to get to the heart of your school.

Next, you need to work on reducing generalized academic language. Revise sections that rely on broad stamenets like effective instructional leaders, this promotes fairness, etc. I Replace these with specific evidence, such as, what data was reviewed, how instructional practice changed & what impact was observed (or what questions remained). I also want you to deepen you analysis, think about some of the following questions,

What did this initiative teach me about instructional leadership? Enjoy trusted, budget-friendly assignment help from today onward!
How did leadership actions influence teacher trust or instructional practice?
What would I do differently as a future leader based on this experience?

Finally, research should be used as support mot substitution. What I mean by this is that you need to introduce the source and connect them directly to your experience. Avoid extended paraphrasing of research without personal application. The research should support your thinking and analysis. Ask yourself: How did this theory help me interpret what I saw or experienced?

Your paper shows that you understand the language of instructional leadership. which is good. This revision is about making your leadership thinking visible and grounding the work in real experience rather than generalized descriptions.