Reference no: EM133567721

use the questions to guide you answer

Describe the content of the article:

1. What was the main idea(s) or question(s) the authors were trying to investigate?

2. Does the review evaluate existing research? Has the author explained why particular studies and sets of findings are strong and convincing OR weak and unconvincing?

3. What were the hypotheses?

4. What was the theoretical explanation for the proposed hypotheses?

5. Who were the participants? How many of them were recruited? How were they recruited?

6. What measures/tests were used to assess the variables of interest?

7. What were the main results of the study? Did the results support the hypotheses or not?Evaluate the content provided in the article.

1. What are the strengths of the methods used in study?

2. What are the limitations of the methods used? What could or should have been done differently and why?

3. What are the strengths and/or limitations of the sample they used? Was the sample representative of the population and appropriate for the topic?

4. What was the most interesting or important finding? What did you find interesting about it? How does this finding add to scientific knowledge about this topic?

5. Are there any useful applications that could result from this study (i.e., is there any way these findings could be useful to people in the real world)? What are they?

6. What future research should be done on this topic? Can you briefly describe a study that could extend the research?

7. What information in the article was confusing or unclear? What other information would be useful to help clarify this?