Reference no: EM131715330
Consider a person with the following utility function over wealth: u(w) = ew, where e is the exponential function (approximately equal to 2.7183) and w = wealth in hundreds of thousands of dollars. Suppose that this person has a 40% chance of wealth of $100,000 and a 60% chance of wealth of $2,000,000 as summarized by P(0.40, $100,000, $2,000,000).
a. What is the expected value of wealth?
b. Construct a graph of this utility function (recall your excel?).
c. Is this person risk averse, risk neutral, or a risk seeker?
d. What is this person's certainty equivalent for the prospect?
3. Consider two prospects.
Problem 1: Choose between
|
Prospect A:
|
$2,500 with probability
|
0.33
|
| |
$2,400 with probability
|
0.66
|
| |
Zero with probability
|
0.01
|
|
Prospect B:
|
$2,400 with probability
|
1.00
|
Problem 2: Choose between
|
Prospect C:
|
$2,500 with probability
|
0.33
|
| |
Zero with probability
|
0.67
|
|
Prospect D:
|
$2,400 with probability
|
0.34
|
| |
Zero with probability
|
0.66
|
It has been shown by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky (1979, "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk," Econometrica 47(2), 263-291) that more people choose B when presented with problem 1 and when presented with problem 2, most people choose C. These choices violate expected utility theory. Why?