5. SUMMARY Undertaken (Word document 2 page) Summary not included or poorly presented. Clearly presented. Comprehensive summary. /5 6. Individual Contribution Limited or no contribution as peer reviewed and / or noted by lecturer. Appropriate contribution as peer reviewed and / or noted by lecturer. Individual excelled in the team as acknowledged by the peer review and / or noted by lecturer. /5 Total /42 Converted to a mark out of 25 /25

3. ORIGINALITY / CREATIVITY Creation Work poorly presented. Work presented in an original and creative Work presented in a highly creative manner. manner. Demonstrates willingness to be experimental. /10 4. EFFECTIVENESS OF MESSAGE Message Message absent or vague. The message is clearly and effectively delivered, The message is clearly and powerfully delivered. The and captures the attention of the reader/audience is captured by the message. reader/audience. /5

2. UNDERSTANDING AND CRITICAL REFLECTION Understanding Limited understanding of the assignment topic Sound understanding of the assignment topic Sophisticated understanding of the assignment topic /5 Critical reflection Limited understanding and critical reflection, recommendations were descriptive in nature rather than evaluative. Some understanding and critical reflection, recommendations provide some context to the potential change in approach. Sophisticated understanding and critical reflection, recommendations provides detailed context and analysis on the potential change approach. /5

Creative Option As suggested by the heading the format is left up to the Groups. However the Creative is still required to provide an analysis as noted in the Rubric below: Part A: Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations - fail grade – pass to credit grade - distinction to high distinction grade 1. RESEARCH EFFORT Bibliography Less than 8 references. Research narrow or irrelevant. 10-15 references from wide range of sources More than 15 references from a wide range of sources /2 Assessment task informed by research. Work shows little or no evidence of use of research material. Research material incorporated into work. Good description of the IT implementation issues identified. Research material effectively incorporated into work. Sophisticated coverage of the IT implementation issues identified. /5

Effective communication skills (articulate, logical, confident / Competent & Sustained / limited preparation or confidence / No preparation or confidence) Effective use of visual aids (Excellent / Appropriate / Limited) Effective organisation and time management Summary of Matter (2 page document) – Sophisticated / Comprehensive / Clearly / Limited / Not included) Attention to group cohesiveness: - Introduction of group members and respective talking points - Fluency of presentation (verbal and visual) - Evidence of shared responsibilities - Evidence of a united effort Reference - >15 / 10-15 / < 10 using Harvard Anglia. Total Converted to a mark out of 25

Marking Criteria Marks Awarded Marks Awarded Marks Awarded Marks Awarded Marks Awarded Understanding of the material - Sophisticated / Comprehensive / Competent / Limited / Nil /5 /5 /5 /5 /5 Ability to offer critical reflection - Sophisticated / Comprehensive / Competent / Limited / Nil /5 /5 /5 /5 /5 Informed by research - Sophisticated / Comprehensive / Competent / Limited / Nil /5 /5 /5 /5 /5

Response (15%) Presented a sustained, logical and well-structured response applying the essay structure points. Presented an extended, logical and structured response applying the essay structure points. Presented a logical and structured response applying the essay structure points. Presented a logical response utlising some of the essay structure points. Presented a logical response utlising some of the essay structure points. Presented an underdeveloped response Presented an underdeveloped and incoherent response Reference (5%) >25 relevant references provided > 20 relevant references provided >15 relevant references provided > 10 relevant references provided A minimum of 10 relevant references provided A limited number of general references provided. No references provided

Terminology (5%) Integrated and applied specific, accurate and relevant terminology Consistently throughout applied accurate and relevant terminology Mostly applied accurate and relevant terminology Used some relevant and appropriate terminology Limited use of relevant terminology Used little or inaccurate terminology Used no relevant and inaccurate terminology

Analysis (30%) SOPHISTICATED /CRITICAL discussion of the assignment topic. Analysis reflects excellent engagement with the context of the situation and links to relevant theory / literature. COMPREHENSIVE discussion of the assignment topic. Analysis reflects very good engagement with the context of the situation and links to relevant theory / literature. Provided detailed and reasoned discussion of the assignment topic. Analysis reflects good engagement with the context of the situation or relevant theory / literature. Provided some detailed discussion of the assignment topic. Analysis reflects some engagement with the context of the situation or relevant theory / literature. Simple discussion of the assignment topic. Analysis reflects limited engagement with the context of the situation or relevant theory / literature. Poor Evaluation or analysis. Significant gaps in the analysis and lack of understanding of the issues. Little or no evaluation or analysis.

Criteria HD HD Distinction Credit Pass Fail Fail Research &Knowledge (25%) Demonstrated SOPHISTICATED knowledge and understanding. Demonstrated COMPREHENSIVE knowledge and understanding. Demonstrated a DETAILED and REASONED level of knowledge and understanding. Demonstrated SOME level of knowledge and understanding. Demonstrated a LIMITED but RELEVANT level of knowledge and understanding. Demonstrated a GENERAL level of knowledge and understanding. Lacked any real knowledge or understanding. Judgement (15%) Presented a SOPHISTICATED and CRITICAL judgement with relevant supporting information which identified the judgement as ground-breaking. Presented a COMPREHENSIVE judgement with relevant supporting information. Attempted to present a reasoned judgement with relevant supporting information. Provided some relevant judgement with supporting information. Provided limited judgement with relevant information. Provided some basic information. Did not provide any basic or relevant information.

It’s a 2000 world plus require 10-15 power point slides as well - Options: Your group must select either to complete an essay, present or prepare a Creative. Essay requirements and marks: 2000 (+- 10%) words excluding Bibliography Total 100, reduced to 25 Marks. Presentation requirements and marks: 10 minutes 10-15 PowerPoint Slides 2 page summary of matter plus bibliography (Arial 10, 2.5 margins, 1.5 spacing) Total 36, reduced to 25 Marks. Creative requirements and marks: Up to 10 minutes 2 page summary of matter plus bibliography (Arial 10, 2.5 margins, 1.5 spacing) Total 42, reduced to 25 Marks.