Reference no: EM131421086
Assignment
Respond to the following scenario:
Your best friend approaches you and asks for advice:
Seems his father-in law has been diagnosed with terminal cancer and has only a few weeks to live.
His dying wish is that your friend--a life-long atheist-convert to his religion so he can die happy.
The father-in-law then reveals-- as an inducement--he will add your friend and spouse to his will--as both were currently not included -because he was unhappy his child married an atheist.
Being added to the will would be worth over $1M to your friend and their spouse.
But your friend is so opposed to organized religion that your friend immediately told their spouse they would never convert to any religion, regardless of the circumstances (like making the old father-in law happy, etc) or whether or not there was a windfall of money involved.
Turns out your friend's spouse then said to him ..."lie to him...say you will convert just let him die a happy person".
Your friend then tells their spouse that it's unethical to lie about converting to a religion--even to make the dying man happy.
Then your friend's spouse adds a new wrinkle.....they are about to lose $1M from a business investment that is collapsing...and that they really do need the $1M inheritance that would soon occur.
Your friend asks you--what should I do?
As a devout atheist they reiterate they would never follow through and convert to any religion--but should they lie to make the dying man happy and also pick up the $1M they need?
Especially since their spouse was pressuring them to do so?
What do you recommend to your friend?
|
Suggest significant challenge related to quality management
: Suggest one significant challenge related to quality and performance management. Recommend one managerial approach to overcome this challenge. Provide support for your rationale.
|
|
Summarize the type of study and phenomenon of interest
: Summarize the type of study and phenomenon of interest. Discuss whether the sample and population used was appropriate and Summarize results, limitations of results, conclusions, and applications
|
|
How a dividend cut could lead to increasing stock prices
: When companies cut dividends, it is usually a bad sign for the stock. But apparently not at Monsanto. Several years ago, the company cut its dividend and the stock price went up.
|
|
Explain the difference between genotype and phenotype
: Explain the difference between genotype and phenotype. Give an example of each and describe both in an account that relates to you personally.
|
|
What do you recommend to your friend
: Seems his father-in law has been diagnosed with terminal cancer and has only a few weeks to live. Especially since their spouse was pressuring them to do so? What do you recommend to your friend?
|
|
Discuss about national labor relations act
: Select two (2) of the following acts: National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, Reduction in Force (Age), Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (OW..
|
|
How many shares of stock were outstanding after the dividend
: The market price of the stock was approximately $46 per share, and the par value was $1 per share on the day the dividend was declared and paid. Provide the journal entry to record the distribution.
|
|
What were the positive outcomes of the conflict
: Visit a museum that focuses on cultural history, preferably the history of a certain cultural group, and spend at least an hour observing the exhibits and listening to the guide (if one is available). Observe aspects of culture as they are present..
|
|
Which is a feature of a high-performing organization
: Which of the following is a feature of a high-performing organization? An organization's return on investment is calculated by dividing. One way of pursuing a differentiation strategy is by.
|