Is very well- Expertly written written and and adheres to the adheres to the standards for standards for academic writing. academic writing. Demonstrates Consistently expert use of high- demonstrates quality, credible expert use of and relevant good quality, research sources to credible and support and relevant research develop arguments sources to and position support and statements. Shows develop extensive evidence appropriate of reading beyond arguments and the key reading statements. Shows evidence There are no of reading beyond mistakes in using the key reading the APA Style.

6. Use of academic and discipline conventions and sources of evidence • Is well written with appropriate sentence construction and without typing, grammar or punctuationerrors • Adheres to academic conventions and appropriate terminology • Uses APA style for in-text citation and references Poorly written with errors in Is appropriately written Is well-written and spelling, grammar. for a professional email, adheres to standards for a and has accurate spelling, professional email. Demonstrates inconsistent use of grammar, sentence and good quality, credible and relevant paragraph construction. Demonstrates consistent research sources to support and use of high quality, develop ideas. Demonstrates consistent credible and relevant use of credible and research sources to relevant research sources support and develop There are mistakes in using the APA to support and develop ideas. style. ideas, but these are not always explicit or well There are no mistakes in developed. using the APA style. There are no mistakes in using the APA style.

4. Analysis and application with Limited synthesis and analysis. Demonstrated analysis and synthesis of new Well-developed analysis and synthesis with application of Thoroughly developed and creative analysis Highly sophisticated and creative analysis, synthesis synthesis of new knowledge • Development of recommendations appropriate to the risk andcontext Limited application/recommendations based upon analysis. knowledge with application. Shows the ability to interpret relevant information and literature. recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis. and synthesis with application of pretested models and / or independently developed models and justified recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis of new with existing knowledge. Strong application by way of pretested models and / or independently developed models. Recommendations are clearly justified based on the analysis/synthesis. Applying knowledge to new situations/other cases.

Highly developed A sophisticated understanding of understanding of the field or the field or discipline/s. discipline/s. Discriminates Systematically and between critically assertion of discriminates personal opinion between assertion and information of personal opinion substantiated by and information robust evidence substantiated by from the robust evidence research/course from the materials and research/course extended reading. materials and extended reading. Well demonstrated Mastery of capacity to concepts and explain and apply application to new relevant situations/further concepts. learning.

2. Knowledge and understanding • Understanding of the concepts that underpin work health and safety assessment • Application of the six steps of risk assessment to identify and evaluate elements of risk in the environment Limited understanding of required Knowledge/understanding Thorough concepts and knowledge of the field or discipline. knowledge/understanding of the field or discipline/s. Supports personal opinion Key components of the assignment Resembles a recall or and information are not addressed. summary of key ideas. substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Often conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information Demonstrates a capacity substantiated by evidence to explain and apply from the research/course relevant concepts. materials.

Assessment Attributes Fail (Unacceptable) Pass (Functional) Credit (Proficient) Distinction (Advanced) High Distinction (Exceptional) Grade Description (Grading Scheme) Evidence of unsatisfactory achievement of one or more of the learning objectives of the course, insufficient understanding of the course content and/or unsatisfactory level of skill development. Evidence of satisfactory achievement of course learning objectives, the development of relevant skills to a competent level, and adequate interpretation and critical analysis skills. Evidence of a good level of understanding, knowledge and skill development in relation to the content of the course or work of a superior quality on the majority of the learning objectives of the course. Demonstration of a high level of interpretation and critical analysis skills. Evidence of a high level of achievement of the learning objectives of the course demonstrated in such areas as interpretation and critical analysis, logical argument, use of methodology and communication skills.

3. Ethico-moral reasoning(10%) • Awareness of vulnerable groups in the workplace ie disability, gender, ethnicity, and the effect of identified work health safety risks for those vulnerable groups 4. Academic conventions(20%) • Is well written with appropriate sentence construction and without typing, grammar or punctuation errors • Adheres to academic conventions and appropriate terminology • Uses APA style for in-text citation and references

The following factors will impact the assessment of your review: 1. Knowledge, understanding and application(40%) • Understanding of the concepts that underpin work health and safety assessment • Application of the six steps of risk assessment to identify and evaluate elements of risk in the environment 2. Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge(30%) • Development of recommendations appropriate to the risk and context