Reference no: EM133855564

Question

There is no genuine dispute regarding the material facts. No one disputes the genuineness of any of the life insurance documents or the Divorce Decree and Settlement Agreement. Further, all of the evidence is consistent with Amy being Bob's daughter even though Stan and Stu have questioned that fact throughout the case. The language of the Settlement Agreement permit Bob to add a child as a beneficiary. You think that the question will be resolved by legal rules of contract construction under Virginia law and that the law supports the validity of Amy receiving an equal share of the life insurance proceeds. Seeing the Big Picture of Summary Judgment. Your Statement of Undisputed Facts will be part of your Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment. In your argument supporting summary judgment, you would cite case law to support your contract interpretation argument (in short, that the term "children" includes Amy) and argue that given the undisputed facts, your client is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.