Reference no: EM133393085
Answer the following questions about Standing Rock: A New Moment for Native-American Rights in at least four sentences
1. Explain ways in which Native Americans during the 1970s acted in a manner similar to the nonviolent direct action described by Dr. King.
2. Explain ways in which Native Americans during the 1970s acted in a manner different to the nonviolent direct action described by Dr. King.
3. What is the author's perspective in Standing Rock? How does her perspective limit her argument?
4. Outline the different government actions in standing rock and reflect on the different access points social movements have to influence policy.
5. What is the author seeking to show about the social movement underlying the protests in Standing Rock?
6. How is the process Dr. King described for advancing civil rights potentially relevant to the Native Americans at Standing Rock?
7. How have social movements used social media to spread their message?
8. Identify the multiple access points provided by the separation of powers for social movements to influence policy in the Legislative branch
9. Identify the multiple access points provided by the separation of powers for social movements to influence policy in the Judicial branch
10. Identify the multiple access points provided by the separation of powers for social movements to influence policy in the Executive branch
11. Explain how these access points potentially support or hinder the ability of social movements to achieve gains in civil rights.
12. What is the author's overall argument in the article on Standing Rock?
13. How might the author's argument seek to influence her reader's opinions on the protest at Standing Rock?
14. Describe ways in which a social movement, (such as the Civil Rights movement, Native Americans, women's rights, or another social movement) has been supported and motivated by a Constitutional provision, such as the equal protection clause or due process. Also describe any relevant Supreme Court cases and explain how the ruling in those cases either expanded or limited this group's civil rights.