Good quick response to any of my query. Looks good quality and the expert read the case and provided a proper response instead of rushing despite needed it after 5 hours of asking for help. Instructions were followed correctly, the assignment is prepared correctly too! Cool.

4.Presentation, writing style, grammar, and references Maximum 4 Marks Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. Well organized. Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. Well organized. Good skills in expression and clear presentation of response. Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. Some skills in expression and presentation of response. Meaning apparent but writing style not always fluent or well organized. Grammar and spelling contain errors. Rudimentary skills in expression and presentation of response. Not all material is relevant and/or is presented in a disorganized manner. Meaning apparent but writing style not fluent or well-organized, Grammar and spelling contain errors.

Good skills in expression and clear presentation of response. Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. Some skills in expression and presentation of response. Meaning apparent but writing style not always fluent or well organized. Grammar and spelling contain errors. Rudimentary skills in expression and presentation of response. Not all material is relevant and/or is presented in a disorganized manner. Meaning apparent but writing style not fluent or well-organized, Grammar and spelling contain errors.

4.Presentation, writing style, grammar, and references Maximum 4 Marks Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. Well organized. Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of response. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task. Grammar and spelling accurate. Well organized.

Demonstrates clear understanding in relation to SDLC approach. Demonstrates the thorough understanding of the material presented in core texts and readings. Discusses the SDLC approach. Demonstrates evidence of having read the material presented in core texts and readings. However, literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account. Poor discussion of SDLC approach. Demonstrates very little evidence of having read the material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts.

3. SDLC Approach Maximum 8 marks Demonstrate breadth and depth of understanding in relation to SDLC approach. Has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding in relation to SDLC approach. Has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials.

Strengths and weaknesses are identified. Demonstrates the thorough understanding of the material presented in core texts and readings. Strengths and weaknesses are identified. Demonstrates evidence of having read the material presented in core texts and readings. However, literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account. Strengths and weaknesses are poorly expressed. Demonstrates very little evidence of having read the material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts.

2.Review of cloud-based solution Maximum 8 Marks Clearly identified strengths and weaknesses of cloud solutions. As well as the apply in-depth understanding of the environment that the solution would be used in. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. Clearly identified strengths and weaknesses of cloud solutions Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials.

Credit Pass Specifies the main qualities/ non-behavioural requirements that can be used to judge the operation of the system. Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Specifies some of the qualities/ non-behavioural requirements that can be used to judge the operation of the system. Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However, literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account.

CRITERIA STANDARDS High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail 1.Non-Functional Requirements Maximum 10 Marks Specifies the qualities/ non-behavioural requirements that can be used to judge the operation of the system. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. Specifies the qualities/ non-behavioural requirements that can be used to judge the operation of the system. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials. Specifies the main qualities/ non-behavioural requirements that can be used to judge the operation of the system. Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Specifies some of the qualities/ non-behavioural requirements that can be used to judge the operation of the system. Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However, literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner.

o be able to evaluate development requirements and prepare a feasibility proposal based on multi-disciplinary (financial, human resource, technological) analyses; o be able to formulate and justify system requirement models based on the evaluation of given situations; o be able to assemble the components of a requirements model using the tools and techniques of object-oriented or structured systems modeling.

This assessment aligns with learning outcomes o be able to describe the context of an information system; o be able to compare and contrast the different methodologies of systems analysis and evaluate their appropriateness for different and complex situations; o be able to distinguish between requirement gathering techniques and combine these appropriately to apply to a real scenario;