Overall it was a very good assignment an i got good marks in this assessment. The assignment was qualitative with no plagiarisms, which fulfills my assignment requirements. thanks for the service.

Submission is nearly/completely free of mechanical errors and has a clear, logical conceptual framework. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. 5.0 %Paper Format: APA Style No submission. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. 100 %Total Weightage

References used are reliable, and reference page lists all cited sources with few errors. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. Sources are credible. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. 10.0 %Mechanics No submission. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is lacking. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech, as well as some practice and content-related language

Adequately describes how the First Amendment applies to this situation. Clearly and realistically describes how the First Amendment applies to this situation. 15.0 %Organization No submission. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. Argument is illogical. Conclusion does not support the claims made. Purpose statement is vague, and claims do not thoroughly support it. Argument and conclusion are orderly, but present unconvincing justification of claims. Purpose statement and conclusion are clear. Argument shows logical progression. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Purpose statement and related conclusion are clear and convincing. Information is well-organized and logical. Argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. 10.0 %Research Citations No submission. Reference page includes errors and/or inconsistently used citations. Sources are not credible. Reference page lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriate and documented, although errors are present. In-text citations have few errors.

Rubrics: First Amendment: Religion and Education 1 No Evidence 0.00% 2 Nominal Evidence 69.00% 3 Unacceptable Evidence 74.00% 4 Acceptable Evidence 87.00% 5 Target Evidence 100.00% 100.0 %Category 20.0 %Situation Context No submission. Essay has little or nothing to do with the situation presented in the assignment description. Inadequate description of the situation presented in the assignment description. Essay is overly simplistic, and few details are given. Clear description regarding the situation presented in the assignment description is included along with an explanation of some legal issues and what you would do in the situation presented. Thorough description regarding the situation presented in the assignment description is included along with a clear explanation of any legal issues and how each of the legal issues mentioned would affect your decision in the situation presented. 40.0 %Application of First Amendment No submission. Includes very little information about the First Amendment. Includes vague references to the First Amendment. Application of First Amendment to situation is lacking detail and clarity.

Sentence structure is lacking. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is nearly/completely free of mechanical errors and has a clear, logical conceptual framework. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. 5.0 %Paper Format: APA StyleNo submission. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Purpose statement and related conclusion are clear and convincing. Information is well organized and logical. Argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. 10.0 %Research Citations No submission. Reference page includes errors and/or inconsistently used citations. Sources are not credible. Reference page lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriate and documented, although errors are present. In-text citations have few errors. References used are reliable, and reference page lists all cited sources with few errors. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. Sources are credible. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. 10.0 %Mechanics No submission. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language and/or word choice are present.

Rubrics: Equal Protection and Public Education Essay 1 No Evidence 0.00%2 Nominal Evidence 69.00%3 Unacceptable Evidence 74.00%4 Acceptable Evidence 87.00%5 Target Evidence 100.00% 100.0 Category 60.0 %Equal Protection Description No submission. Essay has little or nothing to do with the items listed in the assignment description. Inadequate coverage of items listed in the assignment description. Essay is overly simplistic, and few details are given. Adequate coverage of all items listed in the assignment description including background, legal issues, and a description of what equal protection requires. Thorough description of all items listed in the assignment description including background, legal issues, and a description of what equal protection requires. 15.0 % Organization No submission. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. Argument is illogical. Conclusion does not support the claims made. Purpose statement is vague, and claims do not thoroughly support it. Argument and conclusion are orderly, but present unconvincing justification of claims. Purpose statement and conclusion are clear. Argument shows logical progression.

10.0 %Mechanics No submission.Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is lacking. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is nearly/completely free of mechanical errors and has a clear, logical conceptual framework. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. 5.0 %Paper Format: APA Style No submission. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

15.0 %Organization No submission. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. Argument is illogical. Conclusion does not support the claims made. Purpose statement is vague, and claims do not thoroughly support it. Argument and conclusion are orderly, but present unconvincing justification of claims. Purpose statement and conclusion are clear. Argument shows logical progression. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Purpose statement and related conclusion are clear and convincing. Information is well organized and logical. Argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. 10.0 %Research Citations No submission. Reference page includes errors and/or inconsistently used citations. Sources are not credible. Reference page lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriate and documented, although errors are present. In-text citations have few errors. References used are reliable, and reference page lists all cited sources with few errors. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. Sources are credible. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

Rubric: Student Discipline and Due Process 1 No Evidence 0.00% 2 Nominal Evidence 69.00% 3 Unacceptable Evidence 74.00% 4 Acceptable Evidence 87.00% 5 Target Evidence 100.00% 100.0 %Category 30.0 %Summary of Due Process Requirements No submission. School suspension due process requirements are not summarized. Inadequately summarizes school suspension due process requirements from the policy/handbook investigated. Adequately summarizes school suspension due process requirements from the policy/handbook investigated. Thoroughly summarizes school-suspension due process requirements from the policy/handbook investigated. 30.0 %Situation Context: School policy regarding suspension procedures as applied to Goss v. Lopez No submission. Essay has little or nothing to do with school policy or Goss v. Lopez. Inadequate comparison of school policy or Goss v. Lopez. Essay is overly simplistic and few details are given. Adequate comparison of the school suspension procedures and Goss v. Lopez. Clear, well-crafted comparison of school suspension procedures and Goss v. Lopez.

10.0 %Mechanics No submission. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is lacking. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is nearly/completely free of mechanical errors and has a clear, logical conceptual framework. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.

Thematic graphic elements are used creatively throughout the PowerPoint to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size and/or color are used well and consistently. 10.0 %PowerPoint: The PowerPoint is not appropriate for the intended audience that is specified. The vocabulary and content within the PowerPoint is appropriate for the intended audience that is specified. The vocabulary and content within the PowerPoint has been creatively crafted specifically for the intended audience that is clearly specified. 30.0 %Description of Activities No submission. The activities are not described clearly, not interactive, or not appropriate for the audience. The description of the activities is unclear or the activities do not necessarily contribute to the learning of the intended material. Both activities are described well enough, interactive, and suitable for the intended audience. Both activities are clearly described and thoughtfully developed to provide meaningful and varied interactive learning opportunities for the intended audience.

please use the rubrics on each assignment to do this assignment Rubrics: Constitution Day Presentation 1 No Evidence 0.00% 2 Nominal Evidence 69.00% 3 Unacceptable Evidence 74.00% 4 Acceptable Evidence 87.00% 5 Target Evidence 100.00% 100.0 %Category 35.0 %PowerPoint: Core U.S. Constitutional Tenets No submission. PowerPoint has little or nothing to do with the core tenets of the U.S. Constitution. The core tenets of the U.S. Constitution are minimally presented, over generalized, or lacking at least one tenet from the list. The core tenets of the U.S. Constitution are adequately presented. The core tenets of the U.S. Constitution are thoroughly presented and clearly delineated. 15.0 %PowerPoint: Engaging (Visual Appeal) No submission. Very few or no graphic elements are used. No variation in layout or typography is employed. There is no connection to any graphic elements and the understanding of the core concepts, ideas, and relationships. Minimal graphic elements are used. Little variation in layout or typography is employed. Graphic elements do not consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships.