Communication II: Written Report lacks an overall Report is organized and clearly Report is well organized and organization. Reader has to written for the most part. In clearly written. The underlying make considerable effort to some areas the logic or flow of logic is clearly articulated and understand the underlying logic ideas is difficult to follow. Words easy to follow. Words are and flow of ideas. Diagrams are are well chosen with some chosen that precisely express absent or inconsistent with the minor exceptions. Diagrams are the intended meaning and text. Grammatical and spelling consistent with the text. support reader comprehension. errors make it difficult for the Sentences are mostly Diagrams or analyses enhance reader to interpret the text in grammatical and only a few and clarify presentation of ideas. places Some incorrect spelling errors are present but Sentences are grammatical and referencing they do not hinder the free from spelling errors. reader.references are relevant references are relevant and and correctly referred to in the correctly referred to in the text text

Communication I: Visualisation The report includes no or few The report includes The report includes a number of visualizations with scant visualizations that take into thoughtful visualizations that explanation of how these account design principles used take into account design visualizations would help in on the course. Some principles used on the course decision making in the explanation is given as to how including appropriate data organization of interest. such visualizations would help visualizations with dashboard in decision making in the design. An explanation is given organization of interest. as to how such visualizations would help in decision making in the organization of interest.

Developmental: Examines relevant development, implementation, organizational or business issues in the development of your SAS Process flow, and generates valid conclusions/decisions from the results Solution is incomplete or Solution/decision is reasonable; Recommended solution is inappropriate method used. further analysis of some of the based on stated criteria, Many criteria were ignored. The alternatives may have led to analysis and constraints. The data mining method and different recommendation. The data mining process flow, and decisions made in developing data mining process flow, and decisions made in its the process flow are not fully decisions made in its development are fully listed and explained. development described explained. The data mining explained. The data mining method used is explained and method used is explained. appropriately referenced.

Design: Identification of constraints/limitations economic, environmental etc. Few or no constraints are identified or some constraints are identified but not accurately analyzed. Little explanation of applicability of the data to the task described is given Most constraints are identified; some are not adequately addressed or accurately analyzed. Explanation of applicability of the data to the task described is given All relevant constraints are identified and accurately analyzed. Explanation of applicability of the data to the task described is given Conceptual Understanding: Explain how the nature of the data leads to the data mining approach, suggest alternate approaches Only one analysis alternative is considered. Inappropriate analyses are selected and/or major procedural and conceptual errors are made. At least two alternatives are considered. Appropriate analyses are selected but analyses include some minor procedural errors. The target and other variables are identified where appropriate.

Novice Competent Proficient Objectives: Identify measurable project objectives Some attempt is made at identifying objectives All major objectives are identified but one or two minor ones are missing or priorities are not established. Identifies project objectives All significant major and minor objectives are identified and appropriately prioritized. Background: Describes decision making situation. Identifies relevant and valid information to support decision making Insufficient information is obtained and/or sources lack validity. Design recommendations are not supported by information collected. Sufficient information is obtained and most sources are valid. All relevant information is obtained and information sources are valid. Design recommendations are well supported by the information.

Assessment criteria and marking scheme The team report will be evaluated on the quality of the work undertaken Style: report well presented (e.g executive summary, introduction, main body and conclusions) • Theme: report has a clear focus (main theme) and develops a clear logical argument • Conceptual understanding: report demonstrates an excellent understanding of the topic • Developmental: quality of report in examining relevant development, implementation, organizational or business issues • Thoughtful visualization of data taking into account design principles learnt on the course • Research: references are relevant and correctly referred to in the text (including page number) and are included in the Bibliography. Providing each member of the team contributes equally, all team members will receive the same mark for the report (maximum 25%). Please be aware that peer evaluations may affect your final mark.

PLEASE NOTE: • Your report must not exceed 3000 words, including appendices and references. • Please clearly indicate the total word count on your report’s title page. • HINT: You may have heard of the saying, “A picture is worth 1000 words”. Therefore, graphs, tables and drawings are encouraged. When used effectively, they are a useful tool for representing key points (and replacing words). • As this is a team assignment, all team members are expected to discuss the project together and contribute equally. A peer review among team members must be completed. • Your assignment is due 23:59 hours (11.59 pm). This is a firm deadline.

{Related to this project you will carry out an individual research proposal this is designed to give you sufficient background to assist the team in brainstorming ideas for the final proposal, and to develop your understanding of the theory behind business analytics} You must strictly adhere to word and page guidelines. Failure to do so will incur a penalty. Date Deliverables 25 Notification of team details and project title 3 Individual Project Research Proposal (see separate document) 20 (Friday) Final Report (by 11:59 pm via Blackboard) 9-18 Team Presentations during practical time; venue to be advised

For this assignment, you are required to work in a team of 4 students to undertake research, prepare a report and make a presentation. The assignment involves a presentation which will occur on one of the following days: 9th, 11th, 16th or 18th. Presentations will be scheduled in the tutorial that the majority of your team attend. The schedule will be published as soon as all teams are identified This team assignment is designed to provide you with an opportunity to gain hands-on skills with Business Analytics software, specifically SAS Enterprise Miner, SAS Enterprise Guide and tableau. It consists of two parts (see full details below). In brief, your team will: 1. Identify an organisation/problem, prepare a project plan and implement a model solution. 2. Present your solution to the class during practical sessions.

this is hendo and i need help with my SAS assignment. attached is the assignment description, marking rubric, and the dataset. for the assignment description, just focus on part 1 which is the DATA DRIVEN DECISION MAKING WITH SAS ENTERPRISE MINER. in the part 1, there will be the requirement for the essay. I just want to make sure every requirements is met right? Deadline, Word counts, Format, SAS and Tableu, and I need the SAS and Tableu files as well.