Prepare a case analysis using the irac method

Assignment Help Other Subject

Reference no: EM133722801

Problem: Bouvia vs Superior Court Case Analysis

Scenario

Analyze ethical and legal implications of cases involving bioethics. Two examples of highly publicized cases are listed below.

The national discussion concerning decision making for incompetent patients began with the 1976 case of Karen Ann Quinlan. Because she had been left in a persistent vegetative state after two periods of anoxia, her parents sought court authorization to remove her from a ventilator. The New Jersey Supreme Court, in a landmark, unanimous decision, authorized the removal based on Quinlan's constitutional right of privacy, which the court concluded would be lost unless her parents were given authority to exercise it on her behalf. In the 15 years since Quinlan, courts in almost 20 states have reviewed disputes regarding treatment for incompetent patients. Courts in all these states have recognized the general right of competent people to refuse treatment, and in all but two states have also ultimately found that the U.S. Constitution, state constitution, or common law permits a surrogate to make treatment decisions on behalf of an incompetent person (Annas, 1990).

The case of Nancy Cruzan is essentially identical to that of Karen Ann Quinlan, with one exception: Nancy Cruzan, a young woman in a persistent vegetative state because of a 1983 automobile accident, requires only tube feeding (rather than a ventilator and tube feeding) to continue to survive. Her parents firmly believe she would not want to have tube feeding continued under such circumstances, in part based on her own statement that she would not want to continue to live if she could not be "at least halfway normal." For this reason, a trial judge authorized her parents to have their daughter's tube feeding discontinued (Annas, 1990).

Instructions

Select a case for which you are familiar or have an interest that involves medical ethics. Prepare a case analysis using the IRAC method. Your analysis should address the following:

The Issue
Rule
Analysis
Conclusion

Reference no: EM133722801

Questions Cloud

Identify how high quality clinical documentation : Identify how high quality clinical documentation will enhance coding, improve reimbursement from CMS and improve patient outcomes for better population health.

What was china great leap forward : What was China's Great Leap Forward? Why did this program fail? What was the Cultural Revolution in China?

What outstanding career goals do you believe you will have : Identify your personal characteristics, both currently held and those you wish to develop, which will help you meet your goals. Discuss what you will do

Describe pediatric patient and their family members : Describe pediatric patient and/or their family members that you have cared for who is deemed by healthcare professionals to be 'difficult'.

Prepare a case analysis using the irac method : HSA 5200 Rasmussen University- Analyze ethical and legal implications of cases involving bioethics. Prepare a case analysis using the IRAC method.

Discuss core essential beliefs that comprise christianity : Consider the reading and viewing material this week, and discuss what you consider to be the core essential beliefs that comprise Christianity.

What did you find surprising or different than based : What did you find surprising or different than based on your own knowledge of enslavement and what the course has discussed so far.

Describe the context for the origins of the cold war : Explain the historical development of military Keynesianism? What does this concept identify? How did it manifest?

Describe a dynasty influence on culture : How would you describe a dynasty's influence on culture?

User Account

All Pages