Reference no: EM133903984

Question

In 2001 TAP Pharmaceuticals pled guilty to participating in a criminal conspiracy with doctors by providing free samples of Lupron for which the doctors later billed Medicare and patients. Federal prosecutors also charged that TAP executive and midlevel managers with fraud, alleging that TAP employees bribed doctors and hospitals with cash, free vacations, and free samples as an incentive for them to prescribe Lupron. Defendants argued that the samples and gifts were standard industry practice and did not amount to a bribe. In December 2004, a jury acquitted the individuals involved. TAP itself settled its case with the government by agreeing to pay $150 million restitution to consumers and insurance companies for what the government charged was artificially inflated drug prices. The prices were inflated because of the alleged bribes paid to doctors. TAP did not admit to any wrongdoing, claiming that it settled to avoid further legal costs. Studies have shown that samples, as well as small gifts and lunches, can lead doctors to prescribe more expensive brand names when cheaper generic drugs would be as effective.

What additional facts might you need to know to make a fully informed judgment in this case? What outcome do you believe the pharmaceutical companies are striving to achieve through these practices? What alternatives might be available to pharmaceutical companies to serve a similar outcome without incurring legal liability or crossing ethical lines? Do the doctors or hospitals bear any ethical responsibility under these circumstances? What duties do the pharmaceutical companies, doctors, or hospitals have? What does the principle of fairness require in this case? What rights are implicated?

What specific references and in text citations were used?