5.0 %Mechanics No submission. The lesson plan contains inappropriate, incoherent language and/or sentence structures. The lesson plan contains mechanical and conventional errors or non-relevant language that affects meaning and clarity. The lesson plan has a few mechanical and conventional errors present that do not significantly affect meaning or clarity. Word choice reflects basic, consistent, appropriate use of practice and topic-related language. The lesson plan is free of mechanical and conventional errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and topic-related language.

15.0 %PLANNING: Assessments to Monitor Student Learning No submission. Planned assessments do not clearly measure the stated learning targets, and/or do not include modifications for the individual needs of the student. Planned assessments are inadequate for monitoring the understanding and skill development of students in the content area. The assessments are not well aligned to the stated learning targets and do not include adequate modifications for the individual student. Planned assessments provide clear, basic methods to monitor the deep understanding and skill development of students in the content area throughout and at the end of the lesson. They are generally aligned to the stated learning targets and include simple modifications for the individual student. Planned assessments creatively allow for multiple forms of evidence in order to monitor the understanding and skill development of students in the content area throughout and at the end of the lesson. They are well aligned with the stated learning targets and standards and include well-crafted modifications for the individual needs of students.

15.0 %Lesson Plan Rationale No submission. Lesson plan rationale fails to support lesson plan choices specific to lesson modifications and extensions, based on student needs. Lesson plan rationale is insufficient in supporting lesson plan choices specific to lesson modifications and extensions, based on student needs. Lesson plan rationale is sufficient in supporting lesson plan choices specific to lesson modifications and extensions, based on student needs. Lesson plan rationale is comprehensive and professional in supporting lesson plan choices specific to lesson modifications and extensions, based on student needs. 15.0 %PLANNING: Instructional Script and Materials No submission. Lesson plan does not use effective, verbal, nonverbal techniques in a way that would create opportunities for learning and collaboration. Lesson plan does not adequately address student or class needs, and/or include thinly designed use of verbal, nonverbal techniques to create opportunities for learning and collaboration. Lesson plan includes basic, appropriate use of student-centered verbal, nonverbal techniques to create opportunities for learning and collaboration.

Assignment 2 Rubrics Oral Language Development Lesson Plan 1 No Evidence 0.00% 2 Nominal Evidence 69.00% 3 Unacceptable Evidence 74.00% 4 Acceptable Evidence 87.00% 5 Target Evidence 100.00% 100.0 %Criteria 20.0 %Lesson Plan Content No submission. Lesson plan does not include learning objectives and oral language development instructional activities do not modify and extend skills, aligned to the needs of identified students. Lesson plan includes inappropriate oral language development instructional activities that modify and extend skills, aligned to the needs of identified students. Lesson plan includes appropriate oral language development instructional activities that modify and extend skills, aligned to the needs of identified students. Lesson plan includes engaging oral language development instructional activities that modify and extend skills, aligned to the needs of identified students.