Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 4.96 Total 100%

CPT: Procedure Selection Meets “Proficient” criteria, and description offers keen insight into narrowing procedure options when using an encoder Describes how the CPT procedure selection was narrowed down based on descriptions and adjectives while using the encoder, and provides the narrowed-down list to support response Describes how the CPT procedure selection was narrowed down based on descriptions and adjectives while using the encoder, and provides the narrowed-down list, but description is cursory or inaccurate, or provided list does not support response Does not describe how CPT procedure selection was narrowed down 3.96 CPT: Procedure Code Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation demonstrates a complex grasp on assigning codes to records Assigns the CPT procedure code to the record, explaining why the code is most appropriate for the procedure Assigns the CPT procedure code to the record, explaining why the code is most appropriate for the procedure, but explanation is cursory or illogical Does not assign the CPT procedure code to the record 7.92

CPT: Main Term(s) Meets “Proficient” criteria, and rationale demonstrates a complex grasp on identifying main terms Identifies the main term(s) for each CPT procedure and provides rationale to support response Identifies the main term(s) for each CPT procedure and provides rationale to support response, but rationale is cursory or illogical Does not identify the main term(s) for each CPT procedure 7.92 CPT: Encoder Meets “Proficient” criteria, and description demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of how to use an encoder effectively Describes the results of the search and the process applied to effectively use the encoder Describes the results of the search and the process applied to effectively use the encoder, but description is cursory or lacks detail, or some results are inaccurate Does not describe the results of the search 3.96

HCPCS II: Procedure Code Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation demonstrates a complex grasp on assigning codes to records Assigns the HCPCS II procedure code to the record, explaining why the code is most appropriate for the procedure Assigns the HCPCS II procedure code to the record, explaining why the code is most appropriate for the procedure, but explanation is cursory or illogical Does not assign the HCPCS II procedure code to the record 7.92 CPT: CPT Procedure Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation demonstrates keen insight into making CPT procedure determinations Determines a CPT procedure, explaining how the CPT procedure was determined Determines a CPT procedure and explains how the CPT procedure was determined, but explanation is cursory or lacks detail Does not determine a CPT procedure 5.94

HCPCS II: Encoder Meets “Proficient” criteria, and description demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of how to use an encoder effectively Describes the results of the search and the process applied to effectively use the encoder Describes the results of the search and the process applied to effectively use the encoder, but description is cursory or lacks detail, or some results are inaccurate Does not describe the results of the search 3.96 HCPCS II: Procedure Selection Meets “Proficient” criteria, and description offers keen insight into narrowing procedure options when using an encoder Describes how the HCPCS II procedure selection was narrowed down based on descriptions and adjectives while using the encoder, and provides the narrowed-down list to support response Describes how the HCPCS II procedure selection was narrowed down based on descriptions and adjectives while using the encoder, and provides the narrowed-down list, but description is cursory or inaccurate, or provided list does not support response Does not describe how HCPCS II procedure selection was narrowed down 3.96

HCPCS II: HCPCS II Procedure Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation demonstrates keen insight into making HCPCS II procedure determinations Determines a HCPCS II procedure, explaining how the HCPCS II procedure was determined Determines a HCPCS II procedure and explains how the HCPCS II procedure was determined, but explanation is cursory or lacks detail Does not determine a HCPCS II procedure 5.94 HCPCS II: Main Term(s) Meets “Proficient” criteria, and rationale demonstrates a complex grasp on identifying main terms Identifies the main term(s) for each HCPCS II procedure and provides rationale to support response Identifies the main term(s) for each HCPCS II procedure and provides rationale to support response, but rationale is cursory or illogical Does not identify the main term(s) for each HCPCS II procedure 7.92

ICD-10: Diagnosis Selection Meets “Proficient” criteria, and description offers keen insight into narrowing diagnosis options when using an encoder Describes how the diagnosis selection was narrowed down based on descriptions and adjectives while using the encoder, and provides the narrowed-down list to support response Describes how the diagnosis selection was narrowed down based on descriptions and adjectives while using the encoder, and provides the narrowed-down list, but description is cursory or inaccurate, or provided list does not support response Does not describe how the diagnosis selection was narrowed down 3.96 ICD-10: Assign the Diagnosis Code Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation demonstrates a complex grasp on assigning codes to records Assigns the diagnosis code to the record, explaining why the code is most appropriate for the diagnosis Assigns the diagnosis code to the record, explaining why the code is most appropriate for the diagnosis, but explanation is cursory or illogical Does not assign the diagnosis code to the record 7.92

ICD-10: Main Term(s) Meets “Proficient” criteria, and rationale demonstrates a complex grasp on identifying main terms Identifies the main term(s) for each diagnosis and provides rationale to support response Identifies the main term(s) for each diagnosis and provides rationale to support response, but rationale is cursory or illogical Does not identify the main term(s) for each diagnosis 7.92 ICD-10: Encoder Meets “Proficient” criteria, and description demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of how to use an encoder effectively Describes the results of the search and the process applied to effectively use the encoder Describes the results of the search and the process applied to effectively use the encoder, but description is cursory or lacks detail, or some results are inaccurate Does not describe the results of the search 3.96

Final Project Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your coded patient record with rationale should be a 1- to 2-page Microsoft Word document, double spaced, with 12-pt. Times New Roman Font, one-inch margins, and APA formatting. Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value ICD-10: Diagnosis Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation demonstrates keen insight into making diagnosis determinations Determines a diagnosis, explaining how the diagnosis was determined Determines a diagnosis and explains how the diagnosis was determined, but explanation is cursory or lacks detail Does not determine a diagnosis 5.94 ICD-10: Primary and Secondary Meets “Proficient” criteria, and description demonstrates keen insight into classifying diagnoses as primary or secondary Determines the primary and secondary diagnosis and describes what led to this determination Determines the primary and secondary diagnosis and describes what led to this determination, but description is cursory or lacks detail Does not determine the primary and secondary diagnosis 5.94

Final Submission: Coded Patient Record with Rationale In Module Seven, you will submit your final project. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final product. It should reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. This submission will be graded with the Final Project Rubric. Deliverables Milestone Deliverable Module Due Grading One ICD-10 Coding Three Graded separately; Milestone One Rubric Two HCPCS II Coding Four Graded separately; Milestone Two Rubric Three CPT and E/M Coding Five Graded separately; Milestone Three Rubric Final Submission: Coded Patient Record with Rationale Seven Graded separately; Final Project Rubric